Supreme Court will evaluate the legality of the program Deferred Action for Parents of Americans & Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) which was issued by President Barack Obama in November 2014 in response to the passage of immigration reform. The Supreme Court Ruling is noted to affect thousands ...
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden warned Monday that a Supreme Court ruling grantingpresidents broad immunity from prosecutionwould make an unchecked Republican Donald Trump “more emboldened to do whatever he wants” if he regains the White House in November’s election. ...
Kavanaugh said the judiciary was "not the proper forum" to resolve a dispute about immigration arrests, saying such policies could be altered through congressional appropriations and oversight, changes to the law and federal elections. Had the high court accepted Texas and Louisiana's arguments, Kava...
Supreme Court Immigration Ruling in Arizona v. U.S. Got It Backward The real states'-rights issue in immigration policy is whether local governments can protect their residents from harsh and overreaching federal enforcement, writes Robert Morgenthau. by Robert M. Morgenthau | July 11, 2012 4:...
Prelogar said such a ruling would "absolutely scramble immigration enforcement efforts on the ground," saying federal officials have broad discretion to decide which immigrants to arrest. Judd Stone, Texas' solicitor general, told the justices the Biden administration's argument was erroneous because ...
Supreme CourtImmigration IN THIS SECTION Woman granted protection order against ‘violent and abusive’ granddaughter Man (29) in court charged with attempted murder of off-duty PSNI officer Judge asks Pavee Point to intervene between feuding families in Cork ...
of employment authorization, some experts say that a win for Kansas could open the doors for other states' efforts to regulate immigration. "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander," saidStephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration professor at Cornell Law...
"The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday offered new hope to thousands of long-term immigrants seeking to avoid deportation in a ruling that faulted the federal government for improperly notifying a man who came to the United States illegally from Guatemala to appear f...
The Supreme Court’s decision also may have wider implications beyond this case. Red states, such as Texas and Florida, have filed lawsuits to thwart parts of the Biden administration’s immigration agenda. These cases rely on the premise that the states meet the standing requirements...
While the emergency appeal of a lower court ruling upholding the action by Texas did not require an explanation for their votes, it likely is because the majority felt the Constitution grants power to the federal government over individual states when it comes to border control. The ...