a Supreme Court litigator with Sidley and federal regulatory law expert. "The Court sought to minimize the retroactive impact of its decision by noting that prior decisions that relied on Chevron deference are themselves entitled to 'statutory stare decisis,' but it remains to be seen the ...
Supreme Court agrees to hear age-discrimination case; Lawsuits: High court is asked to rule on bounds of a federal law protecting people over age 40ASSOCIATED PRESS
While same sex marriage has come before the court before, in 2013, the high court declined to answer the question of whether gay and lesbian couples had a constitutional right to wed. One case -- a challenge to California’s now-defunct ban on same-sex marriage, known as Proposition 8 -...
Supreme Court Likely to Rule against Public Employees ; Nearly 40-Year Precedent Has Allowed Unions to Impose Fees on Non- MembersRichard WolfUsa Today
The Utah Supreme Court in State v. Phillips denied the applicability of the freedom of speech provisions of the fist amendment (and by dicta any other provision of the Bill of Rights) as a protection of individual rights against state governments by way of the due process clause of the ...
1. Arizona Rules of Evidence 401 and 403¶6 Guarino argues that the trial court abused its discretion inadmitting evidence of Frank's statements recounting the events precedingChad's death because they were "irrelevant or cumulative and unfairlyprejudicial under Rule 403." Although the rules of...
Advocates for felon voting rights were disappointed the court didn't rule in their favor, but stressed they believe it's incumbent on state lawmakers to pass a bill making the changes. "Our clients now have no recourse to the courts and is therefore past time for the legislatu...
A federal district court in Rhode Island ruled for the federal government, concluding in September 2021 that under the first step of the Chevron analysis, the federal law underlying the new monitoring rule was ambiguous. He then concluded that the National Marine Fisheries Service's decision to re...
therefore with a "subtle and complex question with far-reaching implications" going to the jurisdiction of the District Court over the Secretary, which was resolved by the District Court in favor of jurisdiction, but that has been inadequately briefed by the Secretary. This Court's Rule 40(g)...
his Fifth Amendment claim by failing to make a timely, specific objection to Dr. Grigson's testimony at trial.See602 F.2d at 708, n.19. In addition, we note that the State did not present the waiver argument in its petition for certiorari.Seethis Court's Rule 40(1)(d)(2) (1970)...