Rent Control Hits the Supreme Court.The article presents the author's opinions regarding a pending 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing rent control fraud within New York City.Wall Street Journal - Eastern EditionEpsteinRichardA.
The bottom line is that the Supreme Court should take this opportunity to limit the Bay State’s greedy politicians. P.S. This case is partly a fight between proponents of territorial taxation (the good guys) and proponents of extraterritorial taxation (the bad guys). P.P.S. The Supreme ...
The city asserted it has “expansive powers” to regulate business; however, the company ultimately won and the appeal court judge concluded, per a summary of the case: “With the bylaws in place, the respondents were regulated twice on the subject of rent control … and it ...
Activision Blizzard therefore is a "speaker" potentially affected by the California statute at issue here, with a direct and concrete interest in this Court's resolution of the constitutional questions this case presents. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT This brief explains the origins, mechanics, and ...
Hence we set aside the findings on franchises so that the court may examine the problem in the light of the elimination from the decree of competitive bidding. We do not take that course in the case of formula deals and master agreements, for the findings in these instances seem to ...
While the majority of the Supreme Court of California upheld the statutes involved in those cases, its decisions were reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. I can see no distinction in the disposition of those cases by this court and the case at bar. In my opinion this court...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TED D. KELLNER, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. AIM IMMUNOTECH INC., THOMAS EQUELS, WILLIAM MITCHELL, STEWART APPELROUTH, and NANCY K. BRYAN, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 3, 2024 Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, ...
In anunsigned opinionwith the three liberal justices in dissent, the divided court said that "careful review" of the case "makes clear that the applicants are virtually certain to succeed on the merits of their argument that the CDC has exceeded its authority." ...
for these tasks.The Supreme Court of Nevada reviewed the case and affirmed the district court's decision. The court held that NRS 289.060(2)(d) requires a ranked peace officer to lead any investigation that could result in punitive action against another peace officer. The court found that ...
This article previews the Supreme Court case Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167 (2005). The author expected the Court to decide whether Title IX's ban on discrimination allows a private individual to sue for retaliati... SM Riley 被引量: 0发表: 2006年 The impact of...