Amy BorrorBrooke M. BurnsKatherine A. Szudy
Supreme Court decision on the case, Zelman, Superintendent of Public Instruction of Ohio, et al. vs. Simmons-Harris et al. Information on the Pilot Project Scholarship Program in the Ohio school district; Issues addressed in the case; Basic assistance offered by the prog...
According to NBC4i,The Ohio Supreme Court has declared a congressional district map unconstitutional, ordering state lawmakers to return to the drawing board. In a 4-3 decision, the Court majority invalidated a second proposed map outlining Ohio’s 15 U.S. House districts on Monday — used by...
In Ohio v. Clark, decided this week, the U.S. Supreme Court held admissible in defendant's criminal trial for child abuse, a teacher's testimony that the three-year-old victim, upon being pressed for an answer, told his pre-school teacher that the defendant was responsible for the ...
Supreme Court of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which attempts to regulate the health care economy in th... LD Weeden - 《Appalachian Journal of Law》 被引量: 0发表: 2012年 加载更多 研究点推荐 Regulate Oil and Gas Activities Local Governments 站内活动 ...
The article discusses the Ohio Supreme court case Cunningham vs. Testa wherein the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals reversed its decision of Mr. Cunningham individual income tax as he was a resident of Ohio in 2008. The Ohio Department of Taxation mentioned that Mr. Cunningham's affidavit contained ...
“We hold that the March 2 plan unduly favors the Republican Party and disfavors the Democratic Party in violation of the (Ohio Constitution),” the majority decision reads. The 4-3 decisionreflected the other decisions the court has made on redistricting: Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor vote...
图书Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 79... 介绍、书评、论坛及推荐
The article focuses on the opinion of Ohio Supreme Court to the counterclaim of Robert and Katherine Welling against Lauri Weinfeld for invasion of privacy. It was stated that the jury sided with the Wellings on their invasion of privacy claim. The invasion of privacy was based on the use of...
rights when they coerced and significantly encouraged platforms to suppress content related to COVID-19 vaccines and the election. Itnarrowed the scopeof the district court's order but said federal employees could not "coerce or significantly encourage" a platform's content-moderation decisio...