The Extraordinary Counter-Majoritarian Power of the New Supreme Court of NepalBerkeley Electronic Press Selected WorksR. Stith
Worse, Nader is being charged with the future crime of allowing President Bush to make Supreme Court appointments that will create a dark age of socially regressive rulings against the interests of feminists, organized labor, and civil ... Koshlan Mayer-Blackwell - 《Hospital Management》 被引量...
critics who argue that social and economic rights are non-justiciable, a robust and experimental role conception embraced by the Court positions it to be an important actor for realizing socio-economic rights in Nepal, but only if it acts in alignment with civil society and other institutions. ...
Importantly, while Section 79 and its rules were upheld, the court said that it needs to be read down, and a court order or a government order needs to be taken. Section 79 and the IT rules will also be subject to Article 19 (2) which puts reasonable restrictions on free speech, and...
BINAJ GURUBACHARYA
NEPALPUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONSECULARISMIn 2005 a human rights petition at the Supreme Court challenged the tradition of living goddesses called Kumaris and, in particular, that of the former royal Kumari, who lives a sequestered ritual life until puberty, and who used to bless and legitimate the...
The Role of the Judiciary and the Supreme Court in the Constitution-Making Process: The Case of Nepalconstitution makingconstituent powerscourtsNepalI. INTRODUCTION 70 II. SEPARATION OF POWERS...doi:10.2139/ssrn.3365406Zhu, GuobinKouroutakis, Antonios...
critics who argue that social and economic rights are non-justiciable, a robust and experimental role conception embraced by the Court positions it to be an important actor for realizing socio-economic rights in Nepal, but only if it acts in alignment with civil society and other institutions. ...
This Project's fate was put on balance with a non-governmental organization moving the Supreme Court, alleging the Project would help India at Nepal's expense, and asking the Court to stop it since it was "illegal" and went against "national interests". The Court's ruling, touching broadly...
The Supreme Court of Nepal has jointly punished the principal offender for poaching offences with their accomplices, which has helped to discourage in poaching of the one-horned rhinoceros. Nevertheless, a quasi-judicial body, the Office of the National Park, which handles the case firsthand, ...