Kendall Houghtonis quoted on the U.S. Supreme Court’s oral arguments forDelaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Kendall L. Houghton 合伙人 电话+1 202 239 3673 邮箱kendall.houghton@alston.com Press ReleaseDecember 20, 2024 Tiffany Li Qu Honored by Leadership Council on Legal Diversity with a ...
Supreme Court of Delaware held that he was not entitled to relief, on the ground that the restaurant's action was not state action within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the restaurant was not required by a Delaware statute to serve all persons entering its place of business...
The Practice handled two more merits cases in the Court’s 2023 Term. No matter the subject area, we embrace the challenge of distilling complicated cases to their essence and presenting them in clear, meticulous briefs and compelling oral arguments. Whether we are defending a favorable decision ...
This Court has already determined that an imposition of restrictive measures on sex offenders adjudged to be dangerous is a legitimate nonpunitive governmental objective. Hendricks, 521 U. S., at 363. Here, as in Hendricks, nothing on the statute's face suggests that the legislature sought to...
In October 1944, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments inKorematsu v. United States. In the case, Fred Korematsu, a U.S. citizen, challenged the constitutionality of his federal criminal conviction for violating a U.S. Army order excluding him, because he was of Japane...
The Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments in both cases in February, allowing an expedited schedule, and the justices are expected to make a decision by the end of June, when the term ends. February's arguments are also likely to give insight into how the justi...
Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted September 13, 1976. Decided May 13, 1977. Merritt Burke, III, Deputy Atty. Gen. and Henley Graves, Asst. Deputy Atty. Gen., Georgetown, for plaintiff below, appellee. George F. Gardner, III, and John Williams, of Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P. A.,...
The Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments in February, allowing the case an expedited schedule, and is expected to make a decision by the end of June, when the term ends. February's arguments are also likely to give insight into how the justices view the program. But the program wi...
Most of this Court's encounters with the Confrontation Clause have involved either the admissibility of out-of-court statements, see, e.g., Ohio v. Roberts, 448 U. S. 56 (1980); Dutton v. Evans, 400 U. S. 74 (1970), or restrictions on the scope of cross-examination, Delaware v....
RELATED:Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh tests positive for COVID-19 Justice Brett Kavanaugh will participate remotely from his home next week during oral arguments aftertesting positive for COVID-19despite being vaccinated. The court said Friday that the 54-year-old justice has no symptoms. ...