1A Victory: SCOTUS Again Confirms ‘Hate Speech’ is Protected August 19, 2018 // 20 Comments » In the world we awoke to on November 8, 2016, a myth took hold among many progressive people that so-called “hate speech” — speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender...
The Supreme Court on Monday will hear two cases that involve "jawboning," or informal pressure by the government on an intermediary to take certain actions that will suppress speech.
Supreme Court decision which declared a law against circulation of so-called crush videos, involving crushing of small animals, a violation of free speech. It cites the influential 1970 book "The System of Freedom of Expression" by Thomas I. Emerson for its calculus of freedom of expression ...
Hate speech and hate crimes: campus conduct codes and supreme court rulings. J Stud Aff Res Pract. 1997;34(2):112-122.Palmer, C. J., Penney, S. W., and Gehring, D. D. (1997). Hate speech and hate crimes: Campus conduct codes and Supreme Court rulings. NASPA Journal, 34, 112...
Conrad Mills20 hours ago Forrester’s annual State Of B2B Events Survey is back! We invite all B2B event leaders and practitioners to participate and gain access to the latest B2B event market trends to help shape their event strategy over the next 12 months. Last Year’s Survey The 2024...
July 30, 2024Constitutional Law, Federal Circuit, first amendment, free speech, Here's the list of tags in CSV form: Trademark Law, intellectual property, Lanham Act, paid, Per Curiam Decision, Political Speech, Right of Publicity, Supreme Court, Trademark, Trademark Litigation, trademark registra...
Ottawa, Ontario– The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that Biblical speech opposing homosexual behavior, including in written form, is essentially a hate crime. On Wednesday, the court upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers reg...
“It is not lost on the Court the seriousness of the issue the legislature was attempting to address, nor does the Court doubt the good intentions behind the enactment of (the law),” Ozderen wrote. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that any law that dealing with speech “is subject to...
The Court rejected these notions saying that the names and phrases come from the public, not the government, and should be protected speech. “Holding that the registration of a trade-mark converts the mark into government speech would constitute a huge and dangerous extension of the governmen...
Below is a rush transcript that may contain errors GLENN: So there's a couple of things. Let me start with some good news. A judge -- let me just read this. No individuals associated with the left, who engaged in far right speech, and violently suppressed the protected speech of Trump...