In June 2022, the high court found Congress didn't grant the EPA the authority under the Clean Air Act to set emissions caps based on the generation-shifting approach taken through the Clean Power Plan rule. More from CBS News Trump ordered to sit for deposition in defamation suit against...
Erin Tinerella, of Chicago, who is in Washington for the summer at an internship, protests against climate change after the Supreme Court’s EPA decision, Thursday, June 30, 2022, at the Supreme Court in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) By Mark Sherman Published 5:33 AM GMT+8, Ju...
The Supreme Court’s latest climate change ruling could dampen efforts by federal agencies to rein in the tech industry, which went largely unregulated for decades as the government tried to catch up to changes wrought by the internet. In the 6-3 decision that was ...
Unanimous Supreme Court Decision: EPA Administrative Compliance Orders Are Subject to Pre-Enforcement ReviewBob Greenslade
A look at the good neighbor rule and the implications of the court decision. What is the ‘good neighbor’ rule? The EPA adopted the rule as a way to protect downwind states that receive unwanted air pollution from other states. Besides the potential health impacts from out-of-state pollutio...
新闻June 30, 2022 MarketWatch| Supreme Court Limits EPA’s Role in Combating Climate Change in a Fresh Jab at the 50-Year-Old Clean Air Act Kevin Minolicommentson how the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision inWest Virginia v. EPAcould be blunted by a review of EPA strategy. ...
This summer’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling limiting how theEnvironmental Protection Agencyregulates power plants could have far-reaching implications for other regulations, not only from the EPA but also from other agencies. 播放(k) In a 6-3 decision, the court ruled in West Virginia v. EPA ...
The Supreme Court has rejected a petition to review a case in which liable parties at a California Superfund site sought the court’s backing, with the petitioners citing the justices’ recent analysis in a decision involving a cleanup in Guam.
"The Supreme Court sided with the fossil fuel industry, kneecapping the federal government's basic ability to tackle climate change," Newsom said. Daniel Farber, a professor at the University of California Berkeley School of Law, said that the decision is a hit to the fight ...
In a closely watched environmental Clean Water Act (CWA) case, the US Supreme Court adopted a far narrower construction of CWA’s definition of “waters...