Asked about the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling on Wednesday, President Biden told reporters it is up to the court to determine the application of Section 3, but said there's "no question" Trump supported an insurrection. The ruling does not apply outside of Colorado, and the state high co...
Whatever the Supreme Court rules, the decision will tear this country apart. If Trump is allowed to be on the ballot in Colorado, half of the country will be outraged, and if Trump is barred from being on the ballot, the other half of the country with be irate. Either wa...
Washington —The Supreme Court on Friday agreed to review a politically explosivedecision from Colorado's top courtthat found former President Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency and would leave him off the state's primary ballot, stepping into a high-stakes legal showdown that could have m...
"Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority's effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision," they continued. Barrett, Trump's last appointee to the high court, wrote in a concurring opinion that in her judgment...
Congress, rather than the states, isresponsible for enforcing the constitutional provision at issue against federal officeholders and candidates,the courtsaid Monday in a “per curiam” opinion, meaning an unsigned ruling for the court. The court was unanimous in reversing ...
(redirected from Opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama, August 30, 1962)Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Legal, Financial. circulation 1. the transport of oxygenated blood through the arteries to the capillaries, where it nourishes the tissues, and the return of oxygen-dep...
Columbian editorial writers
Court:US Supreme Court Date:June 21, 2024 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/602/22o141/ Justia Opinion Summary:The case involves a dispute over the allocation of water from the Rio Grande River among the states of Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado. The Rio Grande Compact, an int...
Last June’s blow struck us hard in the face: The Supreme Court ruled that reproductive rights are no longer the law of the land. Back under the states’ thumbs we go. That was a death knell to a destiny of one’s own. (Thanks, Virginia Woolf!) ...
Luttig also challenged the opinion penned by one of the three dissenters on the seven-member Colorado Supreme Court who said he would have dismissed the challenge to Trump’s eligibility. “I called it unassailable because, as you noted, the preeminent constitutional scholar of our time...