NEAL CONAN
The atmosphere in the Supreme Court on Thursday was “much more tepid” when compared to the oral arguments held for Bush v. Gore in 2000, according to CNN senior Supreme Court analyst Joan Biskupic, who was in the courtroom for hearings during both cases. “Not only could you feel prett...
“Today’s order tells us nothing about how the full Court is going to rule other than that it’s likely there will be some kind of writing, whether by the majority or by Justices who might be writing separate concurrences or dissents,” Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and profe...
The current Supreme Court cases reflect the larger political debate over how schools should conduct themselves, and how transparent the decision-making process should be. Parents and education reform advocates have become more vocal in recent years over curriculums,COVID-19 mask mandates,LGBTQ+ ...
The lower court's approach, if left intact, "would allow courts to substitute their lay analysis for FDA's scientific expertise and to overturn the agency's approval and conditions of use for drugs — even after they have been on the market for decades," a group of former commissioners and...
foreign-related rule of lawjudicial interpretationstypical casesalternative dispute resolution, arbitration, BRI, CICC, Expert Committee, foreign courts, foreign-related cases, international commercial court, judicial interpretations New Group of Supreme People’s Court Belt & Road Typical Cases October 9...
The Supreme Court is expected to rule on several important cases in 2023-24 on such topics as abortion, opioids, social media regulation and more.
Together, the cases have thrust the court into the middle of this year’s presidential election in a way it has largely managed to avoid since its decision in Bush v. Gore effectively decided the 2000 election between former President George W. Bush and former Vice President Al Gore. ...
The court fight over Trump's eligibility for the White House sends the Supreme Court into new territory, as it has never before ruled directly on the 155-year-old provision at the center of the case, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. It also puts the nation's highest court, with a 6-...