Analysis: Freedom of religion case argued before the US Supreme CourtALEX CHADWICK
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is hearing the case Monday of a Christian graphic artist who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples, a dispute that’s the latest clash of religion and gay rights to land at the highest court. The designer and her supporters say that ruli...
Today, the Supreme Court upended decades of precedent that enabled America’s colleges and universities to build vibrant diverse environments where students are prepared to lead and learn from one another. Although the Court’s decision threatens to move the country backwards, the Biden-Harris Admini...
Supreme Court of the United States, final court of appeal and final expositor of the Constitution of the United States. Within the framework of litigation, the Supreme Court marks the boundaries of authority between state and nation, state and state, and
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE: Atheism is Religion according to the 1961 Torcaso v. Watkins case that was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court--the highest cou
William Rehnquist was the 16th chief justice of the United States, appointed to the Supreme Court in 1971 and elevated to chief justice in 1986. Rehnquist served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. After the war, he attended Stanford Univers
While most cases are heard and decided at the local level, the Supreme Court answers tough legal questions facing Californians. “By its very place in the judicial hierarchy, (the Supreme Court) is being asked to answer the hard questions or find solutions to the really hard issues,” said ...
as well as many other laws regarding religion, have existed since the creation of the United States Constitution. There are still cases, however, that test the exact role that these regulations play. Each week, theUniversal Life Church’s blogfocuses on documenting the most noteworthy of these ...
in reprehensible discrimination in both admissions and hiring and in many cases failing to provide adequate and science-based academic instruction. This decision will embolden the creation of more schools, that receive taxpayer funding, to engage in discriminatory practices in the name of religion. ...
Additionally, the code gives guidelines for the justices’ recusal from cases and acceptance of gifts or other benefits. This point, in particular, has caused the public some consternation. Again, these rules uphold the supremacy of the law for the judiciary. Justices must recuse themselves when ...