In addition to the social media case, known as Murthy v. Missouri, the Supreme Court on Monday will also hear a dispute over whether a New York financial regulator violated the National Rifle Association's free speech rights when she pressured banks and insurance companies in the state to...
As important as free speech is to Americans, it is something of a surprise that the Supreme Court did not address its first case involving the free speech rights of students until its 1969 landmark decision in "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District" ("Tinker"). In "...
Last month, ADFaskedthe U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case and decide “whether a law that censors conversations between counselors and clients as ‘unprofessional conduct’ violates theFree Speech Clause.” Now, many groups, including the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the ...
Yes, lawyer R. James George Jr., a law clerk to Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall 45 years ago, responded each time on behalf of the veterans group. "That's okay? And `Bong hits for Jesus?"' Ginsburg said, reaching back to an earlier case involving students' speech rights. ...
The case pits free speech rights against the government’s stated aims of protecting national security, while raising novel issues about social media platforms. A panel of federal judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the law on Dec. 6, ...
In this case, the court ruled on a little statutory question, leaving the issues of First Amendment to another day. In Ysura v. Pocatello Education Association, the court ruled that a state law was not required under the First Amendment to permit employees to have union due deductions set ...
The United States Supreme Court has agreed to decide if a federal law that bans the trademarking of "disparaging" terms constitutes a free speech violation,Reutersreports. The case in question involves a Portland-based band called The Slants, who were denied a trademark because their band name ...
The case pits free speech rights against the government’s stated aims of protecting national security, while raising novel issues about social media platforms. A panel of federal judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the law on Dec. 6, ...
Supreme Court by writ of certiorari was denied. The cases concerned the so-called ldquo;American rule,rdquo; according to which the parties each bear their own litigation expenses, and in particular their own attorneysrsquo; fees, ... FP Schlechtriem - 《Journal of Law & Commerce》 被引量:...
"This Court should not be tempted to turn this case into a textbook example of bad facts making bad law," they wrote. "For public schools systems, under-policing off-campus student speech rather than over-policing it is undoubtedly the better rule." ...