"People are aware of things that they might not be if there was all this corporate money." [Referendum: Are Super PACs Ruining Politics?] But both supporters and opponents of Citizen United agree the Supreme Court is not likely to completely reconsider the case, regardless of Montana's...
Supreme Court: Corporations do not enjoy personal privacy rights.(USA)The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in a case involving AT&T that explored whether it could claim, under personal privacy rights, an exemption from a Freedom of Information Act request.Richey, Warren...
big corporations and rich people do have too much influence, should pay more taxes, and so on. can anything be done about this? sure—even the constitution is not immutable. if you don't like something in the constitution, you are not without recourse. you can always try for a ...
Liberal justice Elena Kagan strongly disagreed that Missouri had standing, pointing out that the lender was financially independent from Missouri, "as corporations typically are." "The revenue loss allegedly grounding this case is MOHELA's alone," Kagan wrote in her dissent. "The state's treasu...
Mayberry is now pending before the Kentucky Supreme Court — and experts say that state court could now easily cite the US Supreme Court precedent as its own rationale for throwing out the case. “It would be an easy out for the Kentucky court to now take the Kavanaugh principal and deny ...
In 2010, the United States Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that laws prohibiting corporate and union political expenditures were unconstitutional. Citizens United made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independ ...
Consumers’ Research on its website asks people to report “woke” actions by companies, saying, “Many corporations are putting progressive activists and their dangerous agendas ahead of customers.” It also opposes the ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing principle that pu...
Less than two years after the Supreme Courtoverturned Roe v. Wade, the issue of abortion returned to the high court. This case involvesaccess to the widely used abortion pillmifepristone and whether the Food and Drug Administration acted unlawfully when it relaxed the rules for the drug's use...
"Those are potential issues for another day, and we do not address or resolve any of those issues here," he wrote for the court. "As to the Moores' case, Congress has long taxed shareholders of an entity on the entity's undistributed income, and it did the same with the MRT. This ...
However, the crux of the Supreme Court case was more specific FDA regulations that allowed mifepristone to be prescribed via a telehealth appointment, and polling shows this may be more controversial. According to a March poll fromIpsos/Axios, only 50 percent of adults supported wome...