Supreme Court Wades into Dispute over Online Retailers and State TaxesSupreme Court wades into dispute over online retailers and state taxesMichael Doyle Washington Bureau
Below is a selection of Supreme Court cases involving taxes, arranged from newest to oldest. Moore v. U.S.(2024) Author:Brett Kavanaugh Congress may attribute an entity's realized and undistributed income to the entity's shareholders or partners, and then tax the shareholders or partners on ...
Members of the Supreme Court are appointed for life by the President. They may be removed only by death, resignation or impeachment. The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review. It may declare acts of Congress or of state governments unconstitutional and therefore invalid. The Supreme Cou...
David Rivkin, one of the lawyers involved in the case against the federal government, interviewed Alito in two articles published in The Wall Street Journal that addressed recent claims of ethics violations on the court and the power of Congress to legislate on the issue. Rivkin represents ...
The Supreme Court of the United States decided one case this morning: Madison County v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., No. 10-72:The Court granted review in this case to decide whether local taxing authorities, which had lawfully imposed real property taxes on land owned in fee simple by...
Discover the recent Supreme Court ruling favoring taxpayers on FBAR penalties. Explore its implications for FBAR filers in this insightful article.
This Court has long upheld taxes of that kind, and we do the same today with the MRT." The ruling from the high court is also likely to alleviate concerns about the ramifications that a broad decision invalidating the mandatory repatriation tax would have had on other provisions of the tax...
The California Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Gov. Gavin Newsom and removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, saying the change would have upended the way government works. The measure would have required voters to approve...
You know a case is fact-free and brought for shabby ideological reasons when even this Supreme Court says to hell with it.
Justice Roberts got it right in his dissent: "The Court, for example, breezily disregards the costs that its decision will impose on retailers. Correctly calculating and remitting sales taxes on all e-commerce sales will likely prove baffling for many retailers." He cites examples of...