Washington— Less than a year after the Supreme Court issued itsmajor decision expanding gun rights, the new legal test laid out by Justice Clarence Thomas in his majority opinion has reshaped the legal landscap
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal ban on firearms for domestic violence offenders.
deadly combination," she said during opening remarks to the justices, adding that the court has recognizing that "the only difference between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence of a gun," a reference to anopinionwritten by Justice Sonia Sotomayor for a unanimous court in 2014...
The first section briefly reviews the history of educational unions in the USA, while the second examines Supreme Court litigation on fair share fees, culminating in its opinion indoi:10.1080/09539960701751527RussoCharles J.Taylor & Francis GroupEducation & the Law...
Prelogar said that’s a different issue and suggested the court could say in an opinion that sides with her argument that the Tennessee law would not impact the sports issue. Kavanaugh expresses concern about patients who later change their minds ...
s earlier decisions made clear that the Seventh Amendment did not prohibit the creation of new rights and their enforcement through agencies. The Supreme Court’s decision in this case is expected by June 2024. If the Supreme Court agrees with the Fifth Circuit’s decision,...
the impact would depend on the contours of its opinion. Andrew Willinger, executive director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, said that the Supreme Court could issue a narrow decision that focuses on some of the unique aspects of the case: the cross-border context and fact that it was...
composition of the Supreme Court has changed considerably since it last weighed in on the use of race in university admissions, in a 2016 decision involving the University of Texas. Themajority opinionin that dispute was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, and the high court found the sch...
In an opinionconcurringin the judgment,Chief JusticeJohn Roberts, Jr., joined the majority on the question before the Court, agreeing that fetal viability is an arbitrary basis for determining whether a legislative restriction on abortion is constitutional and, therefore, that HB 1510 cannot be void...
Texas, the nation’s second-most-populous state and among its most conservative, is a frequently flier at the Supreme Court and Nielson has already made several arguments before the justices during his brief time in the job. Nielson defended a Texas law that is intended to protect conservative...