author suggested reviewers to include When selecting suitable reviewers for a manuscript or research paper, the author should carefully consider a number of factors. The choice of reviewers is crucial, as their
Please take a look at suggestions given by the EiC designed to maximize the chances your paper is favorably reviewed by reviewers and the editor. The introduction should show the reader why your topic is important and the paper worth reading. In other words, why should we care? State the pa...
The reviewers' comment that "your manuscript needs some revisions before it can be sent to the reviewers" means that once you submit the revised paper, it will be sent out for another round of review. To clarify further, your paper has been reviewed once and the reviewer comments have been...
internal reviewers (JKK, IBJ) with a background in social sciences. Initially, the lead author and the two internal reviewers independently screened the 1398 titles and abstracts of papers deemed eligible for the study. Three people were included at this stage to reduce biases that could result ...
Reporting checklists could help authors to describe the surgical technique more transparently and effectively, as well as to assist reviewers and editors evaluate it more informatively, and promote readers to better understand the technique. We previously developed SUPER (surgical technique reporting ...
Create a draft PR with your fix, ideally annotating it with any comments that may help reviewers understand the reason behind your changes (in most cases, a link to the corresponding problem pattern on the FAQ would be enough).Please add your full name and github handle to the list of ...
Content alignment was defined as the degree to which items address the concepts identified in the Common Core State Standards. Items were rated independently by two expert reviewers. Ratings were averaged to determine alignment results. A description of each rating and its interpretation is provided ...
The reviewers searched the literature from 1966 through December 2006 for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ESA treatment in patients with anemia associated with CKD. Inclusion criteria were sample size of 30 or more anemic adults with CKD, comparison of epoetin (alfa and beta) or darbe...
We are grateful to Dr. Elizabeth Miller (Stanford) for her kind help in informally reviewing the manuscript and three anonymous reviewers for their constructive critiques and suggestions. This work is a contribution to the megagrant of the Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Fede...
reject the proposed patches. In the second phase, we tell participants that some of the proposed patches were generated by security-specialized tools (even if the tool was actually a ‘normal’ APR tool) and measure whether the human reviewers would change their decision to adopt or reject a ...