The Senatorsand Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several StateLegislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the UnitedStates and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation,to support this Constitution;but no religious Test shall ever be ...
Frank Phillips
The Supreme Court has unequivocally expressed its belief that Congress' objective in the enactment of Title VII was a prophylactic one: to achieve equality of employment "opportunities" and remove "barriers" to such equality.Id.,at 429-30, 91 S.Ct. at 852-53;See alsoAlbemarle Paper, supra,...
IN THE LIGHT OF TRUTH FREEDOM FIGHTERS FOR AMERICA WORLD RADIO CONTACT: chris@freedomfightersforamerica.com or chris@walkingtall.us "Yet, while denial might placate those who do not prefer to confront unpleasant facts, truth does not mold itse...
I find it pretty gross and unseemly that high court judges are elected in the first place, and to see them speaking of judicial decision-making in such nakedly political terms is disturbing. But it’s the system we’ve got – and with any luck, Democrat JoAnne Kloppenburg will have a ...
16 Yet, the panel opinion in Pace does exactly this: It applies the "knowing waiver" test from College Savings Bank immediately after it discusses Congress's valid waiver, under the Spending Clause, of state sovereign immunity in the Rehabilitation Act.17 This unwarranted judicial cross-over ...
I find it pretty gross and unseemly that high court judges are elected in the first place, and to see them speaking of judicial decision-making in such nakedly political terms is disturbing. But it’s the system we’ve got – and with any luck, Democrat JoAnne Kloppenburg will have a ...
The appeal ofAT&T Corporation v. Commissionerfrom the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board (“ATB”) was among the 10 most requested dockets on theSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts website. It’s unlikely that observers got exactly what they expected because the decision came with a considerable...
Others have made equal protection arguments and structural arguments about the separation of powers to limit the pardon power.34 When a president pardoned a contempt of court conviction, for example, challengers raised structural arguments about judicial independence and the separation of powers. But th...