Massachusetts Rules of Court - State, State KeyRules, Federal and Federal KeyRules, 2013 ed. (Vols. I-IIA, Massachusetts Court Rules)William Malaier
A Californiaappeals court has ruledthat a driver cannot be convicted of distracted driving for using a smartphone mapping application under current state law that prohibits the use of talking and texting while driving. Because the law is sonarrowly tailored-- it prohibits "listening" and talking on...
One of the exceptions to the nonliability of an employer for the torts of its independent contractor is known as the peculiar risk doctrine. fn. 1 California has adopted the doctrine as expressed in sections 413 and 416 of the Restatement Second of the Law of Torts (hereafter Restatement). ...
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE The stipulation provided that Sandarg‟s license was revoked. However, the revocation order was stayed and Sandarg was placed on probation, subject to 15... S Sandarg ...
A California state appellate court has ruled that the state Water Resources Control Board (WRCB) is not required to evaluate whether the amount of wastewater being discharged under proposed regional water board permits is reasonable before those permits can be issued, dealing a blow to environmenta...
图书Rules and Orders of the Court of Chancery of the State of New-York. ... 介绍、书评、论坛及推荐
(a), of the California Rules of Court, and that within 40 days after the effective date of this order petitioner shall file with the clerk of this court, with proof of service of a copy on the State Bar at its San Francisco office, an affidavit containing the matters specified in ...
Supreme Court watchers interested in arbitration cases will have to get their fix next term fromDIRECTV v. Imburgia, which we discussedhere. Will SCOTUS hold that the California intermediate Court did not give effect to the presumption of arbitrability? Will SCOTUS go even further and explain tha...
In some states, such as New York, Rhode Island, and California, video cameras are not allowed anywhere where an individual has a reasonable expectation of complete privacy. These locations include but are not limited to: Changing rooms Hotel rooms Bathrooms Bedrooms Any place where a person may...
JOSEPH L. DROCIAK, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. (Opinion by The Court.) COUNSEL David A. Clare for Petitioner. Diane C. Yu and Starr Babcock for Respondent.[52 Cal. 3d 1087] OPINION THE COURT. The Review Department of the State Bar Court recommends petitioner...