AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA MD ME MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WA WV WI WYAlabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California S T A T E Official Site Alabama Highway Patrol Official State Web...
Nor has there been any showing that subsequent cases have exposed weaknesses or inconsistencies in Dowling. In this regard the case can be contrasted with United States v. Jenkins,420 U.S. 358, 43 L. Ed. 2d 250, 95 S. Ct. 1006 (1975). In Jenkins, the Supreme Court held that the d...
99 S. Ct. 2248, 60 L. Ed. 2d 824 (1979)] and their progeny relate to detention of persons and not inanimate objects. The rationale relied upon by the Court in those cases is inappropriate as applied to `things,'
665, 92 S. Ct. 2646, 33 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1972). Branzburg involved the appeals of three reporters who had been ordered in three separate incidents to testify before a Grand Jury (a jury convened to determine whether to indict a criminal suspect). In all three cases, prosecutors wanted...
1.) a free individual his first right and duty and;2.) 40 Definitions of a Tyrannical government in which to impose your first right and duty upon.TheConstitution's purpose is to fully, in compliance with the Declarationof Independence's foundation, limit the powers of the Federal Government...
33, 109 S.Ct. 285, 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988). We remand this cause to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for a new sentencing proceeding at which the sentencing judge, as trier of fact, is to determine whether the probation agent's request for warrant satisfies the sentencing judge, ...
House Bill 1583 would amend and reenact the portion of Virginia code specifying bomb threats are a Class 5 felony to include threats, whether real or false, to “discharge a firearm within or at” any location where it is already illegal to call a bomb threat. It also would change the ...
http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:8ZmXbqBLlzkJ:www.treasury.gov/tigta/foia/efoia-imds/chapter400-inv/400-160/chapter400-160.doc+federal+rules+to+non+consensual+audio+monitoring&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi0A4jCzJKCt7mfMWlkmNx83TmnCzRH4j247YEaEYSFCorypHyfiCO9aYDIZ_sptIwF...
State, 860 N.E.2d 874, 878-79 (Ind.Ct.App. 2007), which “require[ed] defense counsel to contact the court staff at least ten days prior to a trial date to direct the court staff to call a jury, and that any failure to so notify the court would result in a continuance charged...
Stout, 130 N.E.2d 96 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019), an Indiana appeals court delved into the joint tenancy vs. TBE dichotomy and how the difference between the two realty title vehicles dramatically impacts a judgment lien’s enforceability. The trial court denied the creditor’s motion to ...