For all other Siril tasks the N5105 is signficantly faster than the i3 so in my case it's worth it - your milage may vary. Hopefully this is useful to some of you though that are using older / non-supported hardware. Tensorflow.dll - Non-AVX Thanks, Matt Hi all, I'm in the ...
I have downloaded Starnet ++ for a while now and have not been able to use it. im trying to use it as a soul program not through pixisingith or siril. just the program. i am getting an error for checkpoint file not found. i do not have a starnet_rgb application in the folder it...
I'm using Siril for the first time and, while that in itself is a learning curve, I simply want to add the Starnet++ app to enable me to create starless versions of my image. However, i'm faced with Starnet saying there are issues with Mac M1 installs plus I have no idea, when ...
A word of warning - as I mentioned AVX is used for good reason. The .dll compiled for SSE4.2 is approx. 4x slower when compared to a CPU with AVX instructions (i3-7100U vs N5105). For all other Siril tasks the N5105 is signficantly faster than the i3 so in my case it's worth...
he could not get Starnet 2 working with Siril, but he got Starnet 1 working independently. this was still a major improvement. Miracles happen. Spaceman Oh thank god for that! I thought I might be the only "dummy". Imagine trying to sell a piece of software very few can get up and ...
I’ve installed this native Apple Silicon version here and use it without problems from Siril:https://www.starneta...m/experimental/ I only have an M1 Mac, but I think it should run on M3 as well. The CommandLine version is compiled for both architectures, at least that is what the ...
SiriL 1.2 even after I rename it starnet++ (since it looks like SiriL expects the executable to be called that way). I've also set the SiriL preferences to point to the correct directory for the executable. After all of that SiriL says that it has found a valid executable for StarNet ...
Yeah, when I process a photo taken with duo-narrowband filter and color camera I first create 4 images in Siril software: Halpha, Oiii, HOO composition and HHO composition, then I make starless versions of each of them at once (hence my use of a batch), and I import all of them in...
This works in stand-alone mode using command prompt, and maybe it is possible to trick Siril to call a batch file to launch Starnet in emulator mode. I would note that emulator mode does seem to run very slowly. Generating a star mask on a 1000x1000 16 bit tif is taking several hours...
My TIFFs come from stacking in DeepSkyStacker, then they were color-calibrated and stretched in SiriL. I reduced them to 16 bits with Affinity Photo. Anybody knows where the problem could come from? Are you sure you are using stretched images? This is the only potential problem I can thin...