==8913==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f255cff1110 at pc 0x7f2571844153 bp 0x7f255cff0f00 sp 0x7f255cff0ef0 WRITE of size 8 at 0x7f255cff1110 thread T1 #0 0x7f2571844152 (/opt/freerdp-nightly/bin/../lib/libfreerdp2.so.2+0x181152) ...
==20441==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address0x7ffe4a7621d0at pc0x55d73239950cbp0x7ffe4a761f50sp0x7ffe4a761f40WRITE of size16at0x7ffe4a7621d0thread T0 #00x55d73239950binboost::date_time::base_time<boost::posix_time::ptime, boost::date_time::split_timedate_system<...
however, when I set the BUFFER_SIZE very small, say = 10, and i use the -fsanitizer=address to check for memory leak. it throws a monster of error: ==90673==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x6020000000fb at pc 0x000108868a95 bp 0x7fff573979a0 sp 0x7fff57397998...
表情模板再次来袭！lambda表达式的结果不是BigInt。这是一个懒洋洋地引用操作数的表达式（* 非常简化 *...
As far as I can tell it happens with 63-byte hostnames so I'm guessing some string isn't terminated somewhere: ==12545==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fc3862107df at pc 0x7fc38528723e bp 0x7fff9e686040 sp 0x...
Example - improper down cast on stack See also Address Sanitizer Error: Stack buffer overflow A stack buffer overflow can happen many ways in C or C++. We provide several examples for this category of error that you can catch by a simple recompile.Example...
stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7fffffff2492 at pc 0x7ffff7b15dcb bp 0x7ffffff7d730 sp 0x7ffffff7d728 WRITE of size 2 at 0x7fffffff2492 thread T0 #0 0x7ffff7b15dca (/home/icy/secreal/liblouis/install_asan/lib/liblouis.so.14+0x12dca) #1 0x7ffff7b23212 (/home/icy/secreal/libl...
When my function starts, the very top value left on the stack for me by the previous function is the return address where I should go when my function is done. This means that if my function overruns its stack, the very first thing that it's going to overwrite is the return address....
I calculated this with the difference of the EBP and the address of the buffer (using the debugger). I realized that in order to jump to the malicious code we can jump to any address on the NOP sled. For a sufficiently large value the attack succeeded. I tried to calculate the minimum...