REJECTING CREATION OF A NATIONWIDE DO-NOT-SPAM REGISTRY: SUMMARY OF US FTC REPORTWhen Congress enacted the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, many experts groaned that it would only worsen the spam problem, primarily because it is opt out rather than opt in, and they felt that it was adopted under ...
South Africa - Consumer Protection Act, 2008 United Kingdom - Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 Singapore - Spam Control Act 2007 What are Spam Filtering and Anti-Spam? Spam filtering is a process of identifying and blocking unsolicited or unwanted messages, also...
TheControlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act(CAN-SPAM Act) is a U.S. federal law that was passed in 2003 as a way to help control spam emails. The CAN-SPAM Act requires businesses to follow its rules governing commercial emails and give consumers the right to ...
President George W. Bush madeemail historywhen he signed the bipartisan bill into law in 2003. The CAN-SPAM Act overrode pre-existing anti-spam laws at the state level. That’s one of the primary critiques of the federal law. Some say CAN-SPAM was an attempt to undermine a much more ...
Spam came under relatively mild regulation with the passage of the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act, also officially called the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-197). It became effective in December of 2003 and took effect on January 1, 2004. The ...
In 2003, the federal government also passed an anti-spam law, called the CAN Spam Act. Among other regulations, the CAN Spam Act requires that unsolicited commercial email be clearly identified as such and that consumers be able to opt-out of receiving more emails. The Federal Trade Commission...
In 2003, the federal government also passed an anti-spam law, called the CAN Spam Act. Among other regulations, the CAN Spam Act requires that unsolicited commercial email be clearly identified as such and that consumers be able to opt-out of receiving more emails. The Federal Trade Commission...
the US, this probably isn't terribly interesting to you, but the MAPS RBLcites the Sherman actas a potential cause of concern and notes that no action has hitherto been taken against them to the point that it would actually test the validity and relevance of this act to managing an RBL....
After a message makes it past server-based anti-spam defenses, the Outlook 2003 client can act on messages that have an SCL value greater than or equal to the store junk e-mail configuration setting in the IMF. Messages that exceed this server setting are sent to the junk e-mail folder ...
A number of efforts or initiatives have arisen in response to the growth of Internet-based E-mail spam including, inter alia, purely technical efforts (such as, e.g., the SpamHaus project) and legal initiatives (such as, e.g., the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Controlling the Assault of Non...