The judicial system in South Dakota was cemented by a 1972 constitutional amendment. The SD Supreme Court is made up of five justices who are appointed by the governor for eight-year terms. The justices must be re-confirmed every eight years by an election. Most of the work of the Supreme...
ABERDEEN, S.D. (AP) — COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations are on the rise again in South Dakota, although hospital officials say they're still holding their own on capacity.
John Thune is an American politician who was elected as a Republican to the U.S. Senate in 2004 and began representing South Dakota the following year. He previously served in the U.S. House of Representatives (1997–2003).
The court’s three Democratic appointees publicly dissented from that ruling, although none of the justices offered any explanation for their action. Lead Art: The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, on Sept. 30, 2024. | Francis Chung/POLITICO 4 weeks ago Trump uses Liz ...
Supreme Court ruled in favor of Justice Reynolds, a teacher at Zion Parochial School who had been teaching German to a 10-year-old student, claiming it was an invasion of the 14th Amendment. [Pictured: Justices of the Supreme Court (and others) in 1923, Chief Justice Taft is front and ...
Supreme Court ruled in favor of Justice Reynolds, a teacher at Zion Parochial School who had been teaching German to a 10-year-old student, claiming it was an invasion of the 14th Amendment. [Pictured: Justices of the Supreme Court (and others) in 1923, Chief Justice Taft is front and ...
Supreme Court ruled in favor of Justice Reynolds, a teacher at Zion Parochial School who had been teaching German to a 10-year-old student, claiming it was an invasion of the 14th Amendment. [Pictured: Justices of the Supreme Court (and others) in 1923, Chief Justice Taft is front and ...
Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs May 24, 1984. Decided July 11, 1984. *458 Linda Lea Viken of Finch & Viken, Rapid City, for plaintiff and appellee. Charles M. Thompson of May, Adam, Gerdes & Thompson, Pierre, for defendants and appellants; Patricia A. Meyers of ...
Danielle PaquetteSandhya Somashekhar
But the South Dakota justices wrote that however persuasive the state's arguments may be for revisiting the issue, the 1992 decision has not been overruled and remains the controlling precedent. South Dakota will now take its case to the U.S. Supreme Court, where to be heard, it would need...