I must have posted this graph three times earlier, perhaps I shouldn't do that again. But I do feel it's indicative of a filmprofile's fitness to coöperate with this initial assessment of yours – that's if you tend to do that. And surely your spouse brings a mindset of her own...
Anywhere you go online you can read that X-H2S has more dynamic range than X-H2 yet photonsforphotos.net graphs shows that later one is better. Did PfP get this graph wrong or media is overhyping the X-H2S dynamic range? View:original size ...
Or you may look at opticallimits.com tests results (though they are publishing their findings in a different format of the graph, but conversion to the common format is not a big deal if you know the formulae for sharpness and MTF). My bet is, XF 16-55/2.8 would not beat the MTF ...
"After looking at the graph you know at once that, when it comes to the next Fuji X system lenses, we will need to rewrite the introduction of this chapter. The performance of the Fujinon 1.4/18 in the frame centre is simply sensational as it is able to set new resolution records with...
I could tell straight away on the LCD, and confirmed the day after, the lens is really really sharp, before i'd even considered sharpening tools. Really beautiful details. My main concern was the ugly bokeh critic, which can found on google in plenty of places. Happily, I never experience...