Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects Internet companiesfrom liability for posts from third parties,with few exceptions. 参考译文:《通信体面法》第230条保护互联网公司不因第三方的发布的内容承担责任,基本没有例外。 第二句: It’s this immunity that allows (sitessuch as Twitter )to h...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: More Lessons to Be LearnedJeffrey D Neuburger
Section230oftheCommunicationsDecencyAct:ASurveyoftheLegalLiteratureandReformProposalsApril25,2012JoelR.ReidenbergResearchTeamStanleyD.&NikkiWaxbergChairFoundingDirector,FordhamCLIPJamelaDebelakExecutiveDirector,FordhamCLIPJordanKovnotDean’sFellow,FordhamCLIPTiffanyMiaoProjectFellow,FordhamCLIPACKNOWLEDGEMENTSTheresearchteam...
As Congress moves to repeal or reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as part of the stimulus, we’ve put together a guide to everything the law does and doesn’t do — and how President Trump and Mitch McConnell may be getting it wrong.
If a news site falsely calls you a swindler, you can sue the publisher for libel. But if someone posts that on Facebook, you can't sue the company — just the person who posted it. That's thanks to Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which states that "no pr...
Q: "Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act Protects Websites from Content It Posts That's Created by Third Parties. with the Proliferation of 'Fake News' Appearing on Social Media Sites Such as Facebook and Twitter, Should the Law Be Reexamined?"...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act states that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." FACEBOOK WORKERS STAGE 'VIRTUAL PROTEST' OVER CONTROVERSIAL TRUMP: REPORT...
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act immunizes internet companies from civil liability stemming from content posted to their sites by third parties.
The title of the hearing was “Does Section 230's Sweeping Immunity Enable Big Tech Bad Behavior?” Some conservatives say that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is the reason why the Big Tech companies can get away with “censoring” their content without facing legal repe...
Section 230 was enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA), which amended the Communications Act of 1934, U.S. Congress.1The provision was intended to promote the development of the internet and interactive computer services to expand the information and educational resources...