Second Amendment Case Goes to High CourtMARK SHERMAN
Supreme Courtindividual rightsDistrict of ColumbiaHellerThis article discusses the litigation regarding the Second Amendment currently pending before the Supreme Court. I argue that the narrow issue that is before tSmith, Douglas GSocial Science Electronic Publishing...
2 The US firearms death rate is 25 times higher than in other high-income countries.3 In this Viewpoint, we discuss the recent Supreme Court decision and offer a public health strategy for firearms safety laws. Editorial The Unrelenting Epidemic of Firearm Violence JAMA Full Text ...
When it comes to the Second Amendment, the Supreme Court moves with the all the dispatch of a giant tortoise; slow, plodding and deliberate. After all, it took the High Court 217 years from the time the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791 to finally figure out in 2008 that its guarante...
representatives of the US and UK governments, the United Nations, and the International Committee of the Red Cross, said that it could not comment on the target of Benshoof's inquiry: the 1973 Helms Amendment to the US Foreign ... Howard,S. - 《Bmj Clinical Research》 被引量: 1发表: ...
The State of the Castle: An Overview of Recent Trends in State Castle Doctrine Legislation and Public Policy Second Amendment issues regarding the right to bear arms in the home have come into focus recently with the U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision in Distric... DP Boots,J Bihari,E ...
Federal CourtFederal court opinions on the right to arms.Last updated: May 13, 2007See also Supreme Court decisions.Parker v. District of Columbia, 04-7041 (2007), [PDF] Parker v. District of Columbia, 311 F.Supp.2d 103 (D.D.C. 2004). [PDF] U.S. v. Parker, 03-4119 (10th...
have misunderstood and have made the same argument before. Consequently, the U.S. Supreme Court has made many other rulings about it, most of which recognize the real meaning, while more recent rulings are clearly at odds with the real meaning and intention of the original Second Amendment....
court for months while it considered the constitutionality of the 30-year-old law that disarmed alleged domestic abusers. In an 8-1 ruling last month, the court found that the Second Amendment allows an individual who poses a credible threat to the safety of others to be banned from having ...
Robert Barnes