Sensitivity was significantly decreased for mammograms interpreted with vs without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance Computer-aided detection does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography....
Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC). Cancer Med. 2021;10(7):2191-2204. doi:10.1002/cam4.3803PubMed...
Recall for further diagnostic work-up was indicated in case of incomplete examination (BI-RADS 0) or suspicious or malignant findings (BI-RADS 4 or 5)(D'Orsi et al, 2003; Timmers et al, 2012). The screening program started in 1990 using screen-film mammography. In 2003 the first ...
Diagnostic Radiation Radiation as a cancer cause On Health Effects (Cancer Risk) of Small Doses of Ionizing Radiation On mammograms and mammography Quotes and facts you should know Ionizing Radiation (Fluoroscopy/Mammography/Medical X-Rays) Proven Causes of Breast Cancer ...
These lead to a potential cascade of additional diagnostic imaging, possible benign breast biopsies, psychological distress, and increased utilization of health care resources. In the USA, the 10-year false positive rate with annual screening has been reported at 61% [23]. And unfortunately, a ...
In the combined group, ultrasound detected all the 14 cancers, whereas mammography detected 8, making ultrasound more sensitive (100 vs 57.1%, P ¼ 0.04) with a better diagnostic accuracy (0.999 vs 0.766, P ¼ 0.01). There was no difference between mammography and ultrasound in specificity...
METHODS: During the study period, 107 818 women underwent screening mammograms with almost equal numbers obtained with each technique (49.9% with SFM vs 50.1% with FFDM). We compared SFM with FFDM using the following parameters: recall rate, diagnostic core biopsy rate, cancer detection rates,...
"Encouraging earlier screening starting at age 40 years represents just one facet of the breast care continuum. These assumptions include women accessing screening facilities with up-to-date technology, receiving prompt diagnostic evaluations, and accessing high-quality definitive treatment-a reality that ...
The DA arm participants tended to be less likely than participants in the control arm to undergo diagnostic mammography within 18 months (14 [4.9%] vs 23 [8.7%]), and breast cancer diagnoses were rare (5 total, 3 in the DA arm); no one died of breast cancer during follow-up. Eleven...
Diagnostic performance of digital vs film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773-1783.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared...