JUDGMENT (Psychology)PATENT applicationsSCIENCE & lawPUBLIC policy (Law)RESEARCH teamsPATENT officesMany have advocated for the expansion of peer review to improve scientific judgments in law and public policy. One such test case is the patent examination process, with numerous commentators arguing that...
The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment: A thirty-year retrospective In the present paper we first provide illustrations of the variety of uses to which P. J. Hoffman's "The Paramorphic Representation of Clinical Judgment" (... ME Doherty,B Brehmer 被引量: 56发表: 0年 Common Gen...
This feature of “you” usage may, in turn, lead to observable behavioral patterns in peer review outcomes. First, the personal and engaging conversational tone stimulated by “you” usage may in and of itself make the reviewer like the responses more, as individuals tend to favor things that...
No opinion—The authors did not offer any opinion or judgment. Unclear—The authors did not give a clear conclusion. Readability Readability was assessed in R, using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index readability score44. The SMOG index measures how many years of education are neede...
Impartial Judgment by the "Gatekeepers" of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process High publication demands and the low acceptance rate of peer review journals place the journal editors and their reviewers in a powerful position. Journal ... M Hojat,JS Gonnella,AS Cael...
Case studies, research methods, and modeling approaches Collaborative and intelligent systems Command and control Communication Technologies Crisis planning, training, exercising, and gaming Data fusion, representation, and visualization Decision making and judgment Disaster risk reduction, risk management, ad-...
Impartial Judgment by the "Gatekeepers" of Science: Fallibility and Accountability in the Peer Review Process High publication demands and the low acceptance rate of peer review journals place the journal editors and their reviewers in a powerful position. Journal ... M Hojat,JS Gonnella,AS Cael...
Funders need a way of dispensing precious resources to the best people, and academics are more likely to cite others' work if it advances the field. Why not tap into the evidence of strong scholarship offered by journal metrics to help make a more objective and less burdensome j...
Peer review information Naturethanks Cameron Buckner, Peter Winter and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Additional information Publisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional...
Substantial numbers of clinical trials are never reported in print, and among those that are, many are not reported in sufficient detail to enable judgment... I Chalmers - 《Jama the Journal of the American Medical Association》 被引量: 287发表: 1990年 The Economics of Scientific Misconduct Sc...