It is best to state a clearer summary of the key critique. It seems that the key critique of this article is found in the student's last sentence of the conclusion. It should appear here as well so the reader knows where the writer is going.) It may help to have a heading here ...
This paper highlights how results from large-scale studies can be used to understand students’ knowledge of science. Several scholars express critique of today’s PISA framework, especially with regard to the presentation of the results as national rankings, and suggest alternative and complementary m...
For example, although Barnes shows the GBTM models in the paper as not crossing, depending on how wide the standard errors of the functions are (that aren’t reported), this functional approach would probably assign non-zero probability of them crossing (think low standard error for the higher...
Péter Jacsó’s December 2004 review at the Digital Reference Shelf [http://snipurl.com/dwco] contains an extensive critique and provides evidence that far fewer documents are found with Google Scholar compared to the native search interface of the publisher. He also created a tool for ...
While Redfield's blog was known to an expert audience before, she attained major success as a result the post ''Arsenic-associated bacteria (NASA's claims)'' (Redfield 2010) that strongly critiqued the paper ''A Bacterium That Can Grow by Using Arsenic Instead of Phosphorus'' (Wolfe-Simon...