If don't need to test GCC patches you wrote in our GCC fork, then the default configuration should be all you need. You can update therustc_codegen_gccwithout worrying about GCC. Building with your own GCC vers
If don't need to test GCC patches you wrote in our GCC fork, then the default configuration should be all you need. You can update the rustc_codegen_gcc without worrying about GCC.Building with your own GCC versionIf you wrote a patch for GCC and want to test it without this backend...
rustc_codegen_gcc 被编译器团队采纳为新的编译器后端 rustc_codegen_gcc是在来自于 GCC 的 libgccjit 库的基础上构建的新的 Rust编译器后端。有了 rustc_codegen_gcc ,就可以为 GCC 支持的更广泛的架构集生成编译产物,在某些场景可以享受 GCC 产生的优化。 目前该提案已经被标记为major-change-accepted,期间对...
Command `["./x.py", "test", "--run", "always", "--stage", "0", "tests/assembly/asm", "--compiletest-rustc-args", "-Zpanic-abort-tests \\\n -Zcodegen-backend=\"/home/folkertdev/rust/rustc_codegen_gcc/target/debug/librustc_codegen_gcc.so\" \\\n --sysroot \"/home/f...
va_start/va_end are necessary for defining variadic functions in Rust. For declaring variadic functions defined in C, they are not used. The tests/ui/abi/variadic-ffi.rs test should also fail with cg_gcc though. You probably didn't see the failure because of rustc_codegen_gcc/build_sys...
GCC fork with libgccjit changes needed by rustc_codegen_gcc Resources Readme License GPL-2.0 license Activity Stars 0 stars Watchers 0 watching Forks 0 forks Report repository Releases 296 tags Packages No packages published Languages C++ 32.1% C 31.6% Ada 12.3% D 6.4% Go...
at 16:57:41 ❯ ./y.sh build --sysroot --release [BUILD] build system Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.14s Using `/home/matthias/vcs/github/rustc_codegen_gcc/build/libgccjit/b6f163f52` as path for libgccjit Compiling l...
If there are multiple workflows, there would have to be multiple success jobs per workflow (or maybe it's enough to name them all in the same way? not sure how that works). I think thatbuildon its own will not work here, because thebuildjob actually uses a CImatrix, so it will act...
It seems if we were to allow setting the asm dialect, we would not need to use -masm=intel to fix the issue with memory operands in inline asm. Notes from IRC: what I suggest is you need to add a new field to pass all the way down for in...
#![feature(repr_simd,intrinsics)]extern"rust-intrinsic"{fnsimd_as<T,U>(x:T)->U;}#[derive(Copy,Clone)]#[repr(simd)]structV<T>([T;2]);fnmain(){unsafe{letf =V::<f32>([f32::MIN,f32::MAX]);leti:V=simd_as(f);assert_eq!(i.0[0],f.0[0]asi16);assert_eq!(i.0[1]...