RFC822: 一、简介 1977年,Arpnet在他们开发的几个非正式文本消息传送标准的基础上,制 订了“Arpnet网络之间文本消息格式标准”,即RFC#733。后来为了适应更大、 更复杂的Arpnet网,对RFC#733作了一些修订,形成了RFC#822。虽然RFC#822 是专门为Arpnet网设计的,但其他网络之间的文本消息传输也可以用 二、适用范围 ...
Subject : Re: The Syntax in the RFC Sender : KSecy@Other-Host Reply-To : Sam.Irving@Reg.Organization To : George Jones <Group@Some-Reg.An-Org>, Al.Neuman@MAD.Publisher cc : Important folk: Tom Softwood <Balsa@Tree.Root>, "Sam Irving"@Other-Host;, Standard Distribution: /main/davis...
Other fields, such as "Subject" and "Comments", are regarded simply as strings of text. Note: Any field which has a field-body that is defined as other than simply <text> is to be treated as a struc- tured field. Field-names, unstructured field bodies and structured field bodies each...
Obsoleted by:2822INTERNET STANDARD Updated by:1123,2156,1327,1138,1148Errata Exist RFC # 822 Obsoletes: RFC #733 (NIC #41952)STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OFARPA INTERNET TEXT MESSAGES August 13, 1982 Revised by David H. Crocker Dept. of Electrical Engineering University of Delaware, Newark, DE ...
The first approach is to leverage the existing subject of the certificate to ascertain that the holder of the certificate is authorized to claim authority over a telephone number. The subject might be represented as a domain name in the subjectAltName, such as an "example.net" where that domai...