From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. Which is already a good thing – as that means the associate editor (AE) believes the paper has merit and also matches the journal scope. Given that this is a Springer Nature journal, that’s...
I have submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. The status turned to "Under Review" after two weeks and remained the same for four months. Then, it changed back to "Reviewers Assigned". What could be the possible reason for such a change? Does this mean, I have to w...
Peer review modestly improved the overall score of manuscript quality assigned by physicians using a checklist instrument, with particular improvements in how authors discussed their results in terms of generalisability, certainty, and their significance (Goodman et al., 1994). Medical manuscripts’ reada...
method to obtain multiple collaborative groups. Chao et al. (2022) first construct a heterogeneous network based on the idea of meta-graph and use the improved DeepWalk method to learn the feature representation of nodes. Then, they utilize the Canopy and K-means clustering method to generate c...
(Durieux et al.2019; Bui et al.2024), we acknowledge that SeqTrans is not test-based, which means it can not be run with RepairThemAll. Therefore, to be fair on the ground-truth definition process, we ran end-to-end tests on SeqTrans patches ourselves with an automated framework ...
Hello. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. After the editorial review, the reviewers were invited, and the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned.' After two days (on April 10), the status changed to 'Under Review'. A month later (on May 1), it changed to 'R...