Definition of Restraint in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is Restraint? Meaning of Restraint as a legal term. What does Restraint mean in law?
15th century, in the meaning defined at sense 1a Time Traveler The first known use of restraint was in the 15th century See more words from the same century Phrases Containing restraint head restraint kept/placed under restraint passive restraint prior restraint self-restraint under restra...
Definition of Prior Restraint in the Legal Dictionary - by Free online English dictionary and encyclopedia. What is Prior Restraint? Meaning of Prior Restraint as a legal term. What does Prior Restraint mean in law?
The meaning of RESTRAINT ON ALIENATION is something that serves to prevent a party from alienating property; specifically : a provision in an instrument (as a deed or will) that purports to prohibit or penalize the use of the power of alienation.
Restraint Areashas the meaning given atItem 4ofSchedule 1; Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3 Restraint Areasmeans each country ofthe Worldin which the JetWater System is patented or an application for a patent has been or is ever lodged, or such application or patent is recognised, and each country...
3) the meaning of law 法律涵义 1. In this article the author shart from discussing the meaning of law of enterprise annexation,further analyses the nature of law and characteristics of enterprise annexation and the principal problems exists in enterprise annexation,on this basis,put forward the ...
Transfer Restriction Eventshall have the meaning specified in Section 2.11. Put Restrictionmeans the days between the beginning of the Pricing Period and Closing Date. During this time, the Company shall not be entitled to deliver another Put Notice. ...
They may also attempt to stabilize the meaning of the law, by reconciling differences between statutes or interpreting ambiguous passages. Finally, in a very few cases, they may deem legislation that abrogates basic rights unconstitutional, although the power of courts to do so varies, as do ...
law violated the First Amendment. The court ignored prior language surrounding inciting violence like "clear and present danger" and "bad tendency." In Brandenburg v. Ohio, the Court unanimously backed the "imminent and lawless action" test. In order to restrict speech for inciting violence, the...
It is hoped that by considering the meaning and purpose of free speech in light of the problems caused by hate speech, there will be a better appreciation for the need to balance freedom of the individual with restraint and responsibility. 展开 ...