this paper provides a very comprehensive analysis and review on ***. It includes different levels of reviews on ***, ***, and ***. The logic is very clear and whole article is well written. In addition, to prove more insight about how to integrate the knowledges on current ***, aut...
1. We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft, the detailed corrections are listed below. 2. We...
1. We feel great thanks for your professional review work on our article. As you are concerned, there are several problems that need to be addressed. According to your nice suggestions, we have made extensive corrections to our previous draft, the detailed corrections are listed below. 2. We...
This is where you should describe the work you have done in revision, and clear up any points of misunderstanding from the first round of review. Writing an effective response helps the reviewers and the Editor assess your revised manuscript, and it is important to make the most of this ...
thisreviewround. 1Summaryofresponsetothereviewers’commentsandcorrections/additions Despitetheseverecriticismexpressedbysomeofthereviewers,afterstudyingtheircommentsandthesuggested references,westillbelievethatourresultsareoriginal,correct,andpotentiallyimportantforthesystemsandcontrol ...
Response to Reviewer Comments:回答审稿人的意见 热度: Articlerefno.A1471-2105XSZ-S12 Title ShellfishtoxicityinUKwaters:athreattohumanhealth Author(s) KeithDavidson&EileenBresnan Ref#1 Generalcomments:ThisisaveryusefulshortreviewofshellfishtoxicityinUK.Itcontains ...
Response to the Reviewers' Comments The following are the reviewers' comments related to the database part and our answers to their questions. Comment 1. Objective 4. It is unclear why a special e ort has to be made to construct a database for citrus. Can't the PIs use the available ...
If you should revise your judgment of the validity of the theory, these points will be addressed at greater length in a new version of the paper that I would resubmit to Psychological Review. Response to Specific Points- Reviewer A: In part (1) of your critique the major complaint is ...
Thank you for considering my article for publication in XXX [Journal Name]. I am grateful to you and the reviewers for the valuable suggestions provided. Here are responses to the reviewer comments: Comment 1: Language editing for the manuscript has been done. I have used the services...
Thanksvery much for taking your time to review this manuscript. I really appreciateall your comments and suggestions! Please find my itemized responses in belowand my revisions/corrections in the re-submitted files. (这一段基本上是...