英美法术语之Res Judicata Res Judicata，一项重要法律原则，有时写作res adjudicata，既“判力规则，一案不二审”。指法院已经对某一案件作出最终裁决，该裁决具有法律约束力，不得再次提起诉讼。Res Judicata：Latin for"the thing has been judged," which means the issue before the court has already been dec...
Res Judicata,一项重要法律原则,有时写作res adjudicata,既“判力规则,一案不二审”。指法院已经对某一案件作出最终裁决,该裁决具有法律约束力,不得再次提起诉讼。 Res Judicata:Latin for"the thing has been judged," which means the issue before the court has already been decided by another court, betwee...
英美法术语之Res Judicata Res Judicata,一项重要法律原则,有时写作res adjudicata,既“判力规则,一案不二审”。指法院已经对某一案件作出最终裁决,该裁决具有法律约束力,不得再次提起诉讼。 Res Judicata:Latin for"the thing has been judged," which means the issue before the court has already been decided...
英美法术语之Res Judicata Res Judicata,一项重要法律原则,有时写作res adjudicata,既“判力规则,一案不二审”。指法院已经对某一案件作出最终裁决,该裁决具有法律约束力,不得再次提起诉讼。 Res Judicata:Latin for"the thing has been judged," which means the issue before the court has already been decided...
the res judicata effect of the earlier judgement does not hinder a new action based on the existence of the easement.' The judgement of the Supreme Court of 16.10.1995 had the following facts: A concluded a contract in 1988 under which he bought shares in B for 9360, DM payable in 124...
Noun1.res judicata- a matter already settled in court; cannot be raised again res adjudicata matter,topic,issue,subject- some situation or event that is thought about; "he kept drifting off the topic"; "he had been thinking about the subject for several years"; "it is a matter for the...
“collateral estoppel” 和“res judicata”两者的区别在于前者禁止当事人就某项已经裁决的具体事项再提起诉讼;而后者则是指禁止再提出某一诉讼主张或诉因。 以下为相关双语示例: When the agency tried to relitigate the identical issue against Stauffer in another court, the Supreme Court held that the agenc...
On behalf of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Jones Day obtained dismissal of a former employee's breach of contract action that was pending in New York Supreme Court, Bronx County. The former employee claimed, inter alia, that Memorial Sloan brea
Notice: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) States Unpublished Orders Shall Not Be Cited or Used As Precedent Except to Support a Claim of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel or Law of the Case in Any Federal Court Within the Circuit.barry Froschauer, Petitioner/appellant, v. Danny R. Mcbride, Su...
Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23.united States of...