Not allowed to save image with greater width than 8192px when saving for web. Seems like a silly arbitrary limit, imposed by Adobe. Please remove Idea No status TOPICS macOS , Windows Views 15.6K Translate Translate Report Report Reply ...
First of all, this topic will certainly relate to safety and performance. Suppose I have an ArrayList that contains 1 million elements (or larger) and is only allowed to use for loop index. In the process of browsing the elements, suppose I need to remove some elements at some positions...
Yes, we could specify mmap to allocate memory at a non-deterministic address (so there could be a gap between A and B), but we can't use this freedom to stick arbitrary stuff in between A and B since this memory can be directly accessed by the load base[index]. So what does this ...
My main concern here is that giving people the power to delete their own data will lead to some really terrible scenarios. Maybe the onus should be on the lfs hosts to track this properly in case someone does something silly... commentedNov 15, 2016 Cool. We have Git LFS work planned t...
sank 54.shoulders 55.shout 56.showing 57.shower 58.shut 59.sigh 60.sight 61.silenced 62.silk 63.silly 64.silver 65.similarities 66.simple 67.single 68.situation 69.skills 70.skinned 71.staff 72.stage 73.stairs 74.stamp 75.stand 76.standards 77.stars 78.stared 79.started 80.starved 81...
I posted this below, and I think it would work. First, I would choose transparency rather than color, unless you need some of your image to be transparent. Color selections always have the opportunity to select half a pixel, so your size might be off by one pixel....
Not allowed to save image with greater width than 8192px when saving for web. Seems like a silly arbitrary limit, imposed by Adobe. Please remove Idea No status TOPICS macOS , Windows Views 15.4K Translate Translate Report Report More Reply Preview...