Moreover, recent Supreme Court decisions concerning other religious freedoms have raised the profile of religious and associated rights, which will probably result in religious accommodations and religious freedom issues becoming more frequent throughout college campuses....
He relies on historical findings in similar cases to razzle-dazzle the judge and jury. But when a lawyer is in command of his case, understands how and why his position is fair and just, he doesn’t sway the court with arcane case law. He presents the facts logically, in plain ...
This is a great day for religious freedom. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties cases is a much-anticipated and wonderful affirmation as the court process proceeds. It shows that religious freedom continues to be the lifeblood of a country founded on t...
This article examines the recent developments in religious freedom before the European Court of Human Rights Two major trends can be distinguished. On the one hand, the Court considers cases that are focused on individuals and it emphasi... S Langlaude 被引量: 11发表: 2006年 Directions in R...
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Friday that it will hear a case brought by families from Maine who want to use a state tuition program to send their children to religious schools.
The Supreme Court has ruled that teachers in religious schools are not protected by anti-discrimination laws. The justices also ruled that employers with religious objections to birth control can deny contraception coverage. Ilya Shapiro, director of the
(or RFRA) offered a necessary corrective to the 1990 Smith decision that had stripped away the constitutionally-protected right to free exercise of religion. However, recent lawsuits and federal court decisions, such as the Supreme Court’s 2014 Hobby Lobby v. Burwell decision, have created an ...
A Christianity Today Editorial
In light of theUS Supreme Court’s recent announcementthat it will hear theSebelius v. Hobby LobbyandConestoga Wood v. Sebeliuscases concerning the HHS Mandate, the University of Notre Dame has re-filed their case against the Mandate.
What the ruling means for religious freedom and public accommodations laws The Court’s decision was narrow and will have little direct effect on churches. But there are two points worth noting: The Court refused to overturn theSmithcase. ...