rational choice theory 美 英 n.理性选择理论 英英 网络释义 n. 1. the hypothesis, derived from game theory, that there is a rational, definable, and calculable basis to human decision-making 隐私声明 法律声明 广告 反馈 © 2025 Microsoft...
Rational Choice Theory: Pros and Cons Like anything else, there are detractors of the Rational Choice Theory who deny that it works. The leading argument points out that rational actors aren’t always rational. This, of course, is quite true. Not everyone, businesses included, makes sound deci...
The former elaborates on the traditional economist's preference/feasible set apparatus; the latter is the more demanding theory which inquires into the rationality of beliefs and preferences. Elster's approach to the broad theory normally consists in using the thin theory as a reference point and ...
2 请问“理性选择理论”(rational-choice theory)是什么 请问它的具体内容和主要观点. 反馈 收藏
请问“理性选择理论”(rational-choice theory)是什么请问它的具体内容和主要观点. 相关知识点: 试题来源: 解析 理性选择理论述评 ---作者:丘海雄,张应祥 【内容提要】本文介绍和分析了社会科学中理性选择理论的起源与争论,以及社会学中理性选... 分析总结。 丘海雄张应祥内容提要本文介绍和分析了社会科学中理性选择...
【内容提要】本文介绍和分析了社会科学中理性选择理论的起源与争论,以及社会学中理性选择理论发展的新趋势,在对传统理性选择理论作出批判的前提下,提出了以有限理性取代完全理性;承认人的行为也有非理性的一面;关注制度文化对个人偏好和目的的影响作用,参考狭义理性选择的概念,界定理性选择理论在何种情境之下,可以解释何种...
Rational choice theory is a fundamental element of game theory, which provides a mathematical framework for analyzing individuals’ mutually interdependent interactions. In this case, individuals are defined by their preferences over outcomes and the set of possible actions available to each. As its nam...
Rational Choice Theory: Rational choice theory refers to a method for analyzing individual and social behaviors. It starts from the assumption that people make logical decisions about a number of areas, such as purchases or actions. Answer and Explanation: ...
Rational choice theory says individuals rely on rational calculations to make choices that result in outcomes aligned with their best interests.
If we are to believe the proponents of the Theory of Practice and of Rational Choice, the gap between these two paradigmatic approaches cannot be bridged. They rely on ontological premises, theories of motivations and causal models that stand too far apart. In this article, I argue that this...