Since all elements have access to both querySelector* and getElement* calls, you can make chains using both calls, which can be useful if you want some performance gain, but cannot avoid a querySelector* call that can not be written in terms of the getElement* calls. T...
08.17自我总结 关于js 一.原生js获得八种方式 通过ID获取(getElementById) 通过name属性(getElementsByName) 通过标签名(getElementsByTagName) 通过类名(getElementsByClassName) 通过选择器获取一个元素(querySelector) 通过选择器获取一组元素(querySelectorAll) 获取html的方法(document.documentElement) document...
According to [this](https://old.reddit.com/r/learnjavascript/comments/i0f5o8/performance_of_getelementbyid_vs_queryselector/), querySelector may be faster as well, so it's a win-win. --- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>...
I have also found no performance issues to speak of (it was supposed to be slower than document.getElementById, but my own testing suggests that it’s slightly faster). Therefore when it comes to manipulating an element directly, it is to be preferred over jQuery. For example: var element...
string html = Dom["#my-link"].Html(); string html = Dom.Document.GetElementById("my-link").InnerHTML; Some utility methods return nodes, same as jQuery CsQuery vs. jQuery The primary goal of this project was to make it as familiar and portable as possible. There are some differences...
string html = Dom["#my-link"].Html(); string html = Dom.Document.GetElementById("my-link").InnerHTML; Some utility methods return nodes, same as jQuerydom.Each((i,e) => { if (e.Id == "remove-this-id") { e.Parent().RemoveChild(e); } }); ...
string html = Dom["#my-link"].Html(); string html = Dom.Document.GetElementById("my-link").InnerHTML; Some utility methods return nodes, same as jQuery dom.Each((i,e) => { if (e.Id == "remove-this-id") { e.Parent().RemoveChild(e); } }); ...