Nederhof, A.J., Luwel, M., Moed, H.F. (2001). Assessing the quality of scholarly journals in linguistics: An alternative to citation-based journal impact factors. Scientometrics 51, 1, 241-265.Assessing thequality of scholarly journals in linguistics:an alternative tocitation based journal ...
The Clinical Scholars Program was established in 1996 to provide residents an opportunity to participate in a scholarly activity. The program, fully integrated into a community-based, university-affiliated family medicine residency program, is currently structured as a longitudinal educational experience, ...
On 16 December 2012, a group of editors and publishers of scholarly journals gathered at the Annual Meeting of The American Society for Cell Biology in San... MS Fathi - 《Journal of Experimental Biology》 被引量: 218发表: 2013年 Practice Parameter update: Management issues for women with ep...
Peer reviewers without biases, self-interest, and conflicts are supposed to ensure that journals publish high-quality science by evaluating manuscripts and offering suggestions for improvement [5]. However, finding experienced peer reviewers, seniors, and experts is time-consuming and difficult. Moreover...
Quality Assurance in Education publishes original empirical or theoretical articles on Quality Assurance issues, including dimensions and indicators of Quality and Quality Improvement, as applicable to education at all levels, including pre-primary, prim
(Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. The manuscript should be in line with theRecommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journalsand aim for the inclusion of representative human populations (sex, age and ethnicity) as per ...
They conclude that while a policy represents an improvement, it does not suffice for reproducibility. These studies give strength to our analysis as the success rates are comparable. Furthermore, by examining multiple journals with various data policy strictness, we corroborate the finding that open...
While the drivers of the decision to initially adopt quality-management standards have been extensively studied, the drivers of the decision to decertify have received scant scholarly attention. We argue that innovative organizations are generally prone to retaining quality-management certification and ...
In: Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals. Known unknowns and unknown unknowns: electroencephalographic burst suppression and mortality. Assessment and implication of prognostic imbalance in randomized managed trials with a binary outcome...
This iterative feedback loop fosters a culture of continuous improvement and elevates the overall quality of scholarly work. Check out iThenticate’s features designed for research collaboration Can peer review in research identify misconduct? It goes without saying that integrity is the backbone of...