Anyhow, now I notice that in the <Preprocessor Definitions> field of my solution, there is this value "<different options>"; When I compared what is displayed in the <Processor Definitions> field between the VS property pages->Preprocessor->Preprocessors Definitions what that from the .vcxproj ...
This is a problem in the CRT headers since it should be checking if it is building a C or C++ source first.Since the preprocessor is replacing the undefined __cplusplus with 0, it is taking the correct path and defining the _CRT_HAS_CXX17 macro as 0, meaning that you can ignore ...
after running the preprocessor, the Unix-like sed with a rule likes/@@”\([^”]*\)”@@/\1/gis run over the post-preprocessed code. This changes our@@””@@into, which is exactly what is needed. Note that@@has no special meaning (importantly not in the C preprocessor, nor in sed...
A more elaborate experiment iscskin.luain the tests directory. This translates a curly-bracket form into standard Lua, and at its heart is defining '{' and '}' as macros. You have to keep a brace stack, because these tokens still have their old meaning and the table constructor in this...
You have to keep a brace stack, because these tokens still have their old meaning and the table constructor in this example must still work, while the trailing brace must be converted to end.if (a > b) { t = {a,b} } Pass-Through Macros...
now I notice that in the <Preprocessor Definitions> field of my solution, there is this value "<different options>"; When I compared what is displayed in the <Processor Definitions> field between the VS property pages->Preprocessor->Preprocessors Definitions what that from the .vcxproj I found...
so look like the <different options> in the VS property page is mapped to whatever after the "WIN32" in the .vcxproj file. My question is how can I get the <different options> to be explicitly displayed in VS property pages window for viewing and editing?
This is a problem in the CRT headers since it should be checking if it is building a C or C++ source first.Since the preprocessor is replacing the undefined __cplusplus with 0, it is taking the correct path and defining the _CRT_HAS_CXX17 macro as 0, meaning that you can ignore ...
This is a problem in the CRT headers since it should be checking if it is building a C or C++ source first. Since the preprocessor is replacing the undefined __cplusplus with 0, it is taking the correct path and defining the _CRT_HAS_CXX17 macro as 0, meaning that you can ignore ...
1. A method for determining if a user typed one preprocessor directive symbol but intended to type another preprocessor directive symbol, the method comprising: creating a set of defined preprocessor directive symbols including unique preprocessor directive symbols defined in one or more build or sub-...