Police is not legally required to protect mere citizens (as courts held many times already). Because of that only terminal ignoramuses consider police activities to be conductive to their personal safety or well-being. Police already extorts from them, and is not obligated to do anything in re...
A man checks his cell phone as he waits in line to enter the Supreme Court to hear Carpenter v. United States Nov. 29, 2017 in Washington, DC. Alex Wong/Getty Images Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority decision that the government is obligated to get a warrant before compel...
legally obligated to give answers. The statement adduced in evidence dated from 20 December 2016 and was given as part of Operation Winter Key, the Metropolitan Police’s investigation into allegations of non-recent abuse.” He revealed another investigation called Operation Mileshogue. ...
In the casesDeShaney v. WinnebagoandTown of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, the Supreme Court has ruled that police agencies are not obligated to protect citizens. In other words, police are well within their rights to pick and choose when to intervene to protect the lives and property of othe...
s the first mule case the officer has ever run into. But again, the officer is obligated to know what the law is. And, if the law allows for a pedestrian and his animals to be on the highway, then he’s got to perhaps make some other decisions. But I can certainly understand why...
You will be obligated to turn that over if a valid subpoena is issued. Let’s say there is NO law requiring the turnover of encryption keys. I see no reason why the same obligation doesn’t apply to an encrypted document. And I also see no reason why the Court could not appoint a ...