Good is good, but better carries it.精益求精,善益求善。PLOS ONE期刊发表影响因子AgriculturalSciencesinChinaimpactfactor文章送给23个审稿人审阅,underr
YearImpact Factor (IF)Total ArticlesTotal Cites 2023 (2024 update)4.0-- 20224.5-50379 20216.020-56584 20205.91753252461 20195.17452045571 20185.22455843864 20175.54056442988 20166.10066039330 20156.66174535832 2014-- 20138.16784227581 20128.51769122212 20118.69454816668 ...
impact factor 文章送给2－3个审稿人审阅，under review说明已送审了，而wait for other review说明已有审稿人返回审稿的意见(reviewer comments),但还有审稿人未送回，要等待 大家对Plos One的影响因子如何预测？这个期刊的审稿政策决定了论文的平均水平不高。但同时他们还是发表了少数高水平的论文。通常一个期刊的影响...
Agricultural Sciences in China impact factor 文章送给2-3个审稿人审阅,under review说明已送审了,而wait for other review说明已有审稿人返回审稿的意见(reviewer comments),但还有审稿人未送回,要等待大家对Plos One的影响因子如何预测?这个期刊的审稿政策决定了论文的平均水平不高。但同时他们还是发表了少数高水平...
AgriculturalSciencesinChina impactfactor 文章送给2-3个审稿人审阅,underreview说明已送审了,而waitforotherreview说明已有审稿人返回 审稿的意见(reviewercomments),但还有审稿人未送回,要等待 大家对PlosOne的影响因子如何预测? 这个期刊的审稿政策决定了论文的平均水平不高。但同时他们还是发表了少数高水平的论文。通常...
PLOSONE期刊发表影响因子AgriculturalSciencesinChinaimpactfactor文章送给2-3个审稿人审阅,underreview说明已送审了,而waitforotherreview说明已有审稿人返回审稿的意见(reviewercomments),但还有审稿人未送回,要等待大家对PlosOne的影响因子如何预测?这个期刊的审稿氦位梆执豌壕榆撬照疗网桔瞄强秒玛瑚殴匠烯盔缕任絮谣...
学科:MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGYSCIEQ112 / 65 82.31% 名词解释: 汤森路透每年出版一本《期刊引用报告》(Journal Citation Reports,简称JCR)。JCR对86000多种SCI期刊的影响因子(Impact Factor)等指数加以统计。JCR将收录期刊分为176个不同学科类别在JCR的Journal Ranking中,主要参考当年IF,最终每个分区的期刊...
PLOS ONE RESEARCH ARTICLE Carbon stocks of above- and belowground tree biomass in Kibate Forest around Wonchi Crater Lake, Central Highland of Ethiopia a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 a1111111111 Misganaw MeragiawID1*, Zerihun Woldu1☯, Vegard MartinsenID2☯, Bal Ram Singh2...
97.Sequence Analysis of the Capsid Gene during a Genotype II.4 Dominated Norovirus Season in One University Hospital: Identification of Possible Transmission Routes 机译:一家大学医院在II.4基因型占主导的诺如病毒季节衣壳基因的序列分析:可能的传播途径的鉴定 作者:Barbara Juliane Holzknecht;Kristina Træ...
We also note that the power for Egger regression shown here was larger than the one shown in [14] because we did not re- orient SNPs for Egger regression for the purpose of fair comparison. Computational time. We did simulations to compare the computational time for each method. The ...