PI-RADS V2评分"4"分为诊断界值时,诊断结果准确度为79.2%,敏感度为70.4%,特异度为83.8%。常规阅片诊断结果准确度为72.7%,敏感度为49.7%,特异度为92.3%。PI-RADS V2评分诊断效能优于常规阅片。 结论在3.0 T磁共振成像系统,Mp-MRI前列腺中央腺体癌诊断中,应用PI-RADS V2进行评分诊断结果的一致性较高,具有...
PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation of prostate "nodule in nodule" variants: clinical, imaging, and pathological features (R1) and 11.11% (17/153) (R2) had diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) PI-RADS v2.1 score of 4, and 0.66% (1/151) (R1) had a score of 3. ... MH Sun,L Xu,XY Zhang,.....
PI-RADS v2.1Prostate biopsyProstate cancerProstate-specific antigen densityObjectives To analyze the correlation among the imaging features of prostate "nodule in nodule," clinical prostate indices, and pathology results. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the prostate images from 47 ...
There is little data or guidance on how to manage these men especially if a PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesion was biopsy-negative. Ullrich et al. recommend a re-biopsy of a PI-RADS 4 lesion in the peripheral zone when there has been a negative biopsy before but suggest a follow-up for negativ...
Insights into Imaging (2024) 15:79 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01651-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access PI‑RADS v2.1 evaluation of prostate "nodule in nodule" variants: clinical, imaging, and pathological features MingHua Sun1 , Li Xu1, XiaoYan Zhang1, LiYu ...
Lexicon terms and their definitions remain largely un- changed in PI-RADS version 2.1, with the only changes being the redefinition of the term "negative DCE," a new definition of the term "marked" and the introduction of the terms "typ- ical" and "atypical BPH nodule." A number of ...
aftercontrolling forNCCNriskcategory(P=0.156)andreceiptofandrogendeprivationtherapy(P=0.776). Conclusion:mpMRIfindings,includingPI-RADSscoreandnodulesize,mayimproveriskstratificationinmentreatedwithprimaryRT Ó2019ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved. Keywords:Multiparametricmagneticresonanceimaging;PI-RADS;Prostate...
PI-RADS V2评分"4"分为诊断界值时,诊断结果准确度为79.2%,敏感度为70.4%,特异度为83.8%。常规阅片诊断结果准确度为72.7%,敏感度为49.7%,特异度为92.3%。PI-RADS V2评分诊断效能优于常规阅片。 结论在3.0 T磁共振成像系统,Mp-MRI前列腺中央腺体癌诊断中,应用PI-RADS V2进行评分诊断结果的一致性较高,具有...
These findings could improve the diagnostic accuracy of PI-RADS v2.1 for prostate lesions. 展开 关键词: Nodule in nodule PI-RADS v2.1 Prostate biopsy Prostate cancer Prostate-specific antigen density DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01651-6 年份: 2024 ...
PI-RADS has increasingly become an important part of prostate cancer diagnostics. Methods: We aimed to compare the accuracy of using T2 and DW-MRI separately in discriminating prostatic nodule and compare them when using total PIRADS according to PI-RADS-v2 using mp-...