U.S. District Courts | Pennsylvania Western District Court | Civil | 2:25-cv-00491 | 04/08/2025 DOCKET 04/08/2025 (#1) NOTICE OF REMOVAL FROM ALLEGHENY COUNTY., CASE NUMBER GD-25-002403. (FILING FEE, INCLUDING
If the death you are trying to get information on occurred prior to the year 1906 you will have to contact the local agency involved, such as a county court house, as records were not previously to that date kept on the state level. ...
Search Court View Full Docket Activity Report(Civil) updated: ??? 03/12 11:59 ?? EDT New Case Filings: 2/28/2025 - 3/14/2025 CaseNumberFiled SAAVEDRA RAMIREZ v. UNDERWOOD Nature of suit:Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus - General ...
Wainwright case, the United States Supreme Court decided that in state court criminal cases, an indigent defendant must be provided with an attorney at government expense. Since then, many legal activists have contended the same right should be extended to indigent civil litigants. Unfortunately, ...
defendants *598 were guilty of a criminal conspiracy in using a short-wave radio in the automobile involved in the accident in violation of the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission. The proof did not warrant such an argument and in a civil court trial, such was completely ...
Nor was the equal protection guarantee of "meaningful access" violated in this case. By the time respondent presented her application for postconviction relief, she had been represented at trial and in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. InRoss,we concluded that the defendant's access to the tria...
A hearing has begun for a Massachusetts judge facing civil charges over allegations that she allowed an immigrant in her court to evade an immigration enforcement agent Associated PressJune 9, 2025 Create an Account Create a free account to save articles, sign up for newsletter...
[4] Rule 301A of the rules of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County provides as follows: "A. All civil cases, wherein the amount in controversy (exclusive of interest and costs) shall be Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or less, including all appeals from a civil judgment of ...
Civil,Statutory Interpretation,UTPCPL Danganan v. Guardian Protective Services: UTPCPL violation need not be in Pennsylvania Written by Joel Ready on March 2, 2018 The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Danganan v. Guardian Protective Services that a violation of the Unfair Trade Practic...
The voters were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the Public Interest Law Center. The state Democratic Party and Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro’s administration also took their side in the case. Approximately 21,800 mail ballots were rejected in 2020’s presidentia...