It's a good idea to give out the peer review feedback anonymously since this option creates the safe space needed to help build trust and authentic connections. It also allows you to broach challenging topics and enables reviewers to comment freely or ask any questions they have with confidence...
Our publication decisions depend in no small part on the timely efforts of reviewers, and we are indebted to them for contributing their expertise this past year.Brian F. MellCleveland Clinic journal of medicine
but because the editors and potential reviewers are all people in your field, and they'll certainly judge and notice if you have a tendency to submit junk. I would give this advice equally a) to a student who insisted on submitting their own single-author paper, and b) as reasoning ...
service. We will not be able to correct these sections for you. If you would like your manuscript to be edited technically, then you could go through our Scientific Editing service. Although as part of a Publication support Pack, we can help you modify the paper as per journal reviewers' ...
The number of eyeballs (several co-authors and perhaps a couple of reviewers) that could/should have spotted at least some of these shortcomings from the outset is high. I feel that the situation is particularly anomalous because of point 1. That is, granted none i...
manuscript through manuscripts meeting. Reviewers remain unknown to the authors. Every manuscript is treated by the Editors and reviewers as privileged information, and they are instructed to exclude themselves from review of any manuscript that may involve a conflict of interest or the appearance of ...
albeit difficult to evaluate. Some participants noted that multidisciplinary research was more complex; hence, it required more work and focus. One participant suggested that reviewers needed to accept they would only be able to evaluate aspects that fell within their remit, rather than attempting ...
Thus, we needed more quantitative or mixed-methods studies. To bridge the gaps, our study examined how secondary school students’ engagement with peer feedback based on three rounds of tasks in L2 writing classrooms where pedagogical activities in relation to feedback were provided to scaffold ...
iServer is excellent at capturing, organizing, and most particularly, presenting knowledge about the strategic, and operational information about the behavior, structure, and motivation and for providing the insights needed for all forms of change. ...
When an article is published we post the peer reviewers' comments and the authors' responses online. We also post the versions of the paper that were used during peer review. These are the versions that the peer review comments apply to. The versions of the paper that follow are the ...