Examples ofauthor responses to reviewer comments, taken mostly from the final version of the ms. However, similar comments/responses are provided before the final. Occasionally,namesare used because, after the first round of reviews, the ms went through a coaching review system, where author and ...
Be thorough: As a paper reviewer, it's important to provide detailed feedback that covers all aspects of the paper, including its strengths and weaknesses. Be constructive: Feedback should be helpful, not hurtful. Try to frame your comments in a way that's constructive and focused on improv...
paper review的一般写法 一篇Paper Review按照内容可以分为三个部分：1、这篇Paper的概况。谁写的？在哪儿写的？哪年发表的等等……2、这篇Paper的内容。3、你对这篇Paper的看法。详细点来说是这样的：第一部分：文章概况 这部分是最为简单和公式化的，内容主要是文章的作者，作者所处的位置，文章的出处：会议...
从上面的iclr reviewer guide里把整个guide 复制进来,然后再加点真实review的case作为prompt(长度是不是比你想象的长那么点哈哈): Reviewing a submission: step-by-step Summarized in one sentence, a review aims to determine whether a submission will bring sufficient value to the community and contribute new...
我们知道,一定要让reviewer心情愉快!不要挑战他的心情!因为这些reviewer大多是大忙人,没有心情给你慢慢看的。 7.切忌超长段落。一般一个段落以3到5个句子为宜,千万不要追求一气呵成的感觉而堆在一起,那种动辄一页纸的大段落任谁看了都眼晕。如果要表达的内容确实多,可以适当的使用enumerate和itemize,可以让文章...
If there appears to be a logistical error in the reviewer comments, such as the reviewer commenting on the wrong paper, etc., please contact ICIP 2023 at icip2023@cmsworkshops.com. All papers accepted to ICIP 2023 will be published on 11 September 2023 and will be freely accessible and ...
Address all reviewer comments.Take care in responding to reviewer comments, not just specifically, but the spirit of them, as well. Reviewers are volunteers whose goal is to help you improve your paper. Being anonymous, they receive no credit for their efforts, so their reward is seeing author...
Rather than simply aim- ing to answer 'yes' to the questions in the flowchart, it may be more productive to consider why a reader or reviewer might answer 'no' and refine the storyline to address poten- tial concerns. Crafting a clear and engaging storyline for a conceptual paper is a...
Authors then revise their work based on reviewer feedback before submitting the final, camera-ready version for publication. The majority of papers, however, face rejection and are returned to the authors. These authors may opt to resubmit following the previously mentioned process or decide to ...
To do that, I suggest to organize your document as follows. Create a section for each reviewer. Then, in each section copy the comments made by the reviewer and cite it as a quote (“…”). Then explain below the quote how you have addressed the comment. For example, your document co...