‘ostream’ in namespace ‘std’ does not name a type Ask Question Asked11 years, 10 months ago Modified5 years, 3 months ago Viewed23k times 7 As the title suggests I'm experiencing a rather odd problem. When I try to compile a sample source code (that uses libotb) I keep getting...
hardware/qcom/audio-caf/alsa_sound/AudioHardwareALSA.h:639:5: error: 'AudioEventObserver' does not name a type hardware/qcom/audio-caf/alsa_sound/AudioStreamOutALSA.cpp: In member function 'virtual ssize_t android_audio_legacy::AudioStreamOutALSA::write(const void*, size_t)': ...
__ostream_type& write(const char_type* __s, streamsize __n); 1. 2. 3. 用法如下: #include <iostream> #include <fstream> using namespace std; int main() { filebuf buf; if ( buf.open("/proc/self/fd/1", ios::out) == nullptr ) { cerr << "stdout open failed" << endl; r...
Class unsafe_ostream implements all of the functionality described below, but does not prevent simultaneous access by multiple threads; class ostream is a "wrapper" class that implements mutex locks around each of the respective member functions of unsafe_ostream to ensure mt-safety. Simply using th...
(It does not have to widen _Ch before inserting it.)The template functionCopy template<class _Tr> basic_ostream<char, _Tr>& operator<<( basic_ostream<char, _Tr>& _Ostr, const signed char *_Str); returns _Ostr << (const char *)_Str....
basic_ostream(__streambuf_type* __sb) { this->init(__sb); } protected: basic_ostream() { this->init(0); } #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // Non-standard constructor that does not call init() basic_ostream(basic_iostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) { } ...
basic_ostream(__streambuf_type* __sb) { this->init(__sb); } protected: basic_ostream() { this->init(0); } #if __cplusplus >= 201103L // Non-standard constructor that does not call init() basic_ostream(basic_iostream<_CharT, _Traits>&) { } ...
#include<fstream>#include<sstream>#include<boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp>usingnamespacestd;usingnamespaceboost::posix_time;intmain(intnargs,char** pargs){if( nargs <2|| nargs >3){ cerr<<"Usage: "<<pargs[0]<<" file [pos]"<<endl;return1; ...
> So my problem is because String^ does not have a natural overload of '<<' > which is used to add it to streams. THAT is what I need, is a way to > send/recieve String^'s through a stream (both directions). I'm guessing ...
Does anything in the standard make libc++'s behavior of not having a definition for these in libc++.so itself non-compliant? Contributor Author yeputons commented Dec 13, 2021 I've got a soft report from a student that Apple Clang is probably affected as well (it uses libc++), which...