See, for example, Bernard Spinrad, ‘Nuclear Power and Nuclear Weapons: The Connection is Tenuous’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (February 1983); and Alexander de Volpi, ‘Technological Misinformation: Fission and Fusion Weapons’, in David Carlton and Carlo Schaerf (eds), The Arms Race...
Nuclear power does not lead to nuclear weaponsNo Abstract available for this article.doi:10.1038/280010e0GREENHALGHG. HNature Publishing Group UKNature
The article discusses how countries can develop nuclear power minus nuclear weapons. Several diplomatic initiatives are available to combat nuclear proliferation. One is the inspection of nuclear power plants by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the objective being that no country can manufacture a...
What's the difference between a nuclear power plant and a nuclear bomb?In a nuclear bomb, the chain reaction isn't controlled, and that's what makes nuclear weapons so terrifyingly destructive. The entire chain reaction happens in a fraction of a second, with one splitting atom producing two...
Paul, T.V. (2000) Power Versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons. Mon- treal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Paul, T. V. (2000). Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons, Montreal.Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons - Paul - 2000 () ...
to examine, as frankly and fairly as possible, the relationship between legality on the one hand, and political organisation and political struggle on the other, in relation to this most vital of all issues for the survival of the human race, the control and elimination of nuclear weapons. In...
Concern regarding the proliferation of materials for nuclear weapons and the environment will limit the growth of nuclear power in the future, unless these concerns are overcome by social momentum for action on climate change. Nuclear fusion avoids many of the proliferation and environmental concerns ...
Follow RT for information and the latest news on nuclear weapons, including drills, talks, agreements, and treaties.
AccidentsNuclear EnergyNuclear ReactorsNuclear Warfareunavailable]doi:10.1080/07488008508408607SpencerKelvinMed WarMedicine & WarSpencer, K. (1983). Nuclear weapons and nuclear power stations: what is the connection? Medicine and war 1: 41-49.
Or would you prefer to abolish nuclear weapons and live with an increased risk of great-power war and \"nuclear breakout\"? Both sides of this debate claim to have the best solution to prevent nuclear war. Advocates of deterrence maintain that a securely stored second-strike capability ...