About this Nothing Ear (a) review:We tested the Nothing Ear (a) over two weeks. The earbuds ran firmware version 1.0.1.41, and the Nothing X app ran version 2.3.16. Nothing provided the unit for this review. Who are the Nothing Ear (a) for?
Ear detection can be finicky Limited hi-res support No wireless charging $100 at Amazon$100 at Nothing How We Test and Review Products Price and Availability The Nothing Ear (a) currently sell for $100 and are available through Amazon, Newegg, and directly from Nothing’s site. The buds an...
Nothing Ear Stick review: Looks great, sounds good Nothing's new earbuds offer a half-in-ear design that could be more comfortable for some. What I like The Nothing Ear(a) pumps out pleasing audio that's a bit on the warm side. While the bass isn't the strongest, the mid-tones and...
making it smaller and lighter than the ear even with the same battery. There is a tiny LED light on the case that glows in white. The case also has IPX2 ratings for splash resistance compared to IP55 ratings in the Nothing ear.
That said, their mic, noise isolation, and battery life are a bit better than the Nothing's, but they can only connect to one device at a time. Compare Side-by-Side SEE OUR REVIEW Test Results Sort Category Design Style Type In-ear Enclosure Closed-Back Wireless Truly Wireless ...
Nothing Ear(a) review: Great looks, good sound, solid price TWS (Wireless Earbuds) The Nothing Ear(a) are very good mid-range earbuds that doesn't try to reinvent the wheel. They just look great and sounds good. ByBen Sin May 17, 2024 ...
The Nothing Ear (2024), featuring adaptive noise cancellation, ChatGPT interactivity, and pinpoint controls, deliver on their promise
Review: Nothing Ear, Ear (a), and Ear (open) hit all the right notes in all the right places Ben Schoon Nov 26 2024 - 5:05 am PT 1 Comment Truly wireless earbuds are basically a commodity at this point. You can find options at any price point that sound decent and work well en...
This means the Nothing Ear replaces the Ear (2), which replaced the Ear (1). It's a confusing naming scheme that will surely become even more so next year when Nothing will need to name the Ear's successor - Ear (2025) or some such will probably need to be used. The Ear (a),...
Prasad did the Ear (2) review and he noted the dip in the mids. This review makes no comment on the quality of its mids. From what I see, it's likely just a slightly better tuned version of the Ear (2), but still the same flaws, like harsh treble. Reply ? Anonymous 0p} 26...